EPA work plan review, 133-135 and 21-23 buildings, August 2005
Machine-extracted title · confidence 75%
EPA Region 2 letter regarding revised environmental work plan submission for two buildings including asbestos, health, and safety assessment components.
Part II - Environmental Community Monitoring Plan
133-135 Greenwich & 21-23 Thames Streets
Airtek Project 05-0701 — Rev 1 August 11, 2005
Attachment A
Table 1— Community Air Monitoring
Location Parameter(s) Sample Analysis Method Comment
Frequency
Site Area Mercury Each work day Lumex, portable Lumex results
mercury analyzer are real-time
data logged
Site Area Particulate Continuous Visual Observation Visual
(Visible dust during working Notations on
emissions) shifts site log
Site Perimeter- Particulate Daily Laser dispersion
three fixed PM-2.5, Real time analysis,
locations listed PM-10 E-BAM
below
Site perimeter- Particulate Each work day FRM filter analysis Comparison
one of the fixed PM-2.5, (gravimetric) data for E-
locations PM-10 BAMs.
below.
1. Waste load- 1. Asbestos ACM each 1. TEM Sampling
out area on the work shift, and durations may
Southwest each off-day. be modified
corner of the 2. Silica Daily 2. XRD based on Site
Buildings 3. Metals Daily 3. ICP/MS Conditions. See
4. Total Daily 4. Microbalance footote 1 below
2. Roof of HS Dust
Auditorium
5. Organics Organics — See 5. PCB (EPA
3. East end of footnote 2 TO-7A)
Thames below Dioxin (EPA
Sidewalk TO-9A
Bridge (mod)) and
PAH (EPA
TO-13A)
Footnote 1: Sampling duration and/or flow rates may be modified to provide optimum
analyte loading for analysis based on results of ongoing analyses. Initial Sampling flow
rates should be in accordance with rates prescribed in the sampling method.
Footnote 2: Organics will be sampled as provided below under "Notes on the
Community Air Monitoring Table" below.
NYC-WTC 000134952
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000134952Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally