NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
254 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
NYC-WTC_000146129–000146748Folder label: “EPA OIG LAW”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document .. . . World Trade Center Emergency Response Inspections at 105 Duane Street December 11, 2001-0n arrival the porter, Joe insisted that DEP return during normal working hours. He spoke to the building manager via telephone. After about 10 minutes Joe said I will have to return the next day. He also said that the work on the duct cleaning had stopped. December 12, 2001, 10 am - on arrival I met Mr Joel Kupfennan an attorney with NY Environmental Law & Justice Project and a group of tenants outside the building. They informed me that they were concerned about the air quality in the building and that they wanted the duct cleaning work to be stopped. Inspection of the 10 floor and 2nd floor HVAC room revealed that there was no visible suspect material. Ms Lisa Bergenty a building rep said that over 250 TEM sample taken by ATC labs were negative for ACM. She also said that the tenants have the option of requesting additional testing. Presently, they had stopped the work being performed by TECH CLEAN to address the tenants concerns. That they were also willing to treat the duct cleaning as an asbestos project. This information was relayed to the tenants and Mr Kupferman. December 12, 2001, 10:15 pm -inspection was based on a request by DEP to MS Bergenty to conduct additional sampling on the 10th & 2nd Floor HV AC room. ATC was on site conducting aggressive TEM air monitoring. Five pumps were running on the 10th & 2nd floor. Results later submitted to DEP were negative for ACM. December 20, 2001- The purpose of the visit was to determine whether any more sampling was required of the ventilation system. Present were Howard Bader - a consultant for the tenants association, two tenants were present, a representative of Tech Clean (duct cleaning company), ATC Labs rep, Lisa Bergenty of Relations Management (bldg. Mgt. Co.) a DOH- Peter Stallbohlm, Brendan Farell - Super. Some other helpers were present. I requested from Mr. Bader to take us wherever he deemed appropriate to start. The 10th floor diffuser was chosen. On opening, we found that there was no visible dust. Bader also, used a portable monitor to check for respirable fibers and found none. It was then suggested by him that this might be the condition of all the other locations. As a result, no more inspection was necessary. I repeated to him that I would be happy to look at more. One of the tenants, who was present, wanted her apartment vent inspected. This we did and found that there was minor dust accumulation, which appeared to be very old. Bader said that he might take a sample. It was agreed that the owner would treat the clean up of the duct as though it was an ACM project. However, this is on hold because of other concerns by the tenants. DOH also agreed that there was no concern reference ACM. It was acknowledged that the owners are done more than sufficient sampling. The tenants concern was that some procedures were not being follO\ved. Such as, the plastic covering the duct had fallen off or had holes. The tenants also had in their possession a document from EPA dated December 19, 200 I, which indicated DEP methods, were inaccurate. Mr. Kupperman (tenants attorney) met me outside the building and expressed his concern that DEP protocols were incorrect based on the EPA document. Before lea,·ing the site I again requested if there was any other concerns regarding ACl'vl and was told ··no:· Based on my inspection there was no suspect material to be sampled. The owner is still agreeing to do any more sampling required by the tenants. Also. it was agreed that DEP would be notified when any duct cleaning begins. · December 29, 2001 - Inspection revealed that the duct was being cleaned in the HVAC room. The - risers han: hci:n closed off at the fan room. Workers were in PPE usinl! HEPA vacuum to do the cleaninu. - :\l( · was also present conducting air monitoring. An inspection r.!quest of the vent in an apartment on the I~ llnnr ri:n:alcd that then: was no ,·isible suspect mati:rial.
NYC-WTC_000146150
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
No available related records indexed in this group.
NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
254 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000094912
Invoice detailing billing for bulk and air sample analysis results including PLM, PCM, and TEM testing at 44 Wall Street.
21 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093400
A license agreement document regarding exterior cleaning services for the property at 65 Liberty Street.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000132519
A DEP results table showing daily asbestos air monitoring data at 100 Trinity Place from October to November 2001.
29 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000104846
Fax cover sheet transmitting permit application documents for work at 102 and 104 Greenwich Street to the NYC DEP on December 3, 2001.
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099112
Invoice from Fiber Control, Inc. dated November 27, 2002, for exterior cleanup services at multiple sites including 113 Nassau Street.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130799
Invoice from Benjamin Kurzban & Son Control, Inc. for roof work completed at 15 Dutch Street.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000113167
Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. for cleaning services on the facade of 54 Warren Street.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099818
Billing record for asphalt and gravel roof cleanup services performed at 55 Nassau Street in November 2002.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000119790
Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. for DEP environmental protection services at 14 Barclay Street.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000122774
An invoice from Fiber Control Inc. dated August 2002 for facade services performed at 179 Broadway.
11 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000121922
Invoice dated October 2002 for environmental remediation services performed on the exterior of 118 Chambers Street.
9 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000154565
Log of environmental inspections conducted at specific buildings near the World Trade Center on September 23, 2001.
Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000156370
Field notes from September 2001 documenting inspections of buildings like 310 Church Street and 100 Church Street for debris.
Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178386
DEP inspection memo regarding tenant concerns over air quality and halted duct cleaning at World Trade Center site.
Similarity score 0.996 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000148621
Memo outlining DEP activities including assessment and coordination with federal agencies for street and sidewalk cleaning.
Similarity score 0.996 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178162
Report on inspections and tenant concerns regarding air quality and asbestos during duct cleaning work at a World Trade Center building.
Similarity score 0.995 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.995 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Operational period plan from the FDNY detailing actions for December 21, 2001 at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Operational period plan from the FDNY detailing actions for December 21, 2001 at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000138846
OSHA transmits NYS DOL data report containing sample summaries and worker information for WTC.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer