Inter-departmental memorandum requesting hydraulic analysis to verify proposed sewer capacity matches existing brick egg-shaped sewer.
NYC-WTC_000165837–000165839Folder label: “North Access Connection, AMTRAK 10th Ave. Tunnel”
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF SEWERS INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM November 17, 1983
TO: GORDON YEE, P.E., ACTING CHIEF, PRIVATE DRAINAGE REVIEW SECTION
FROM: MAGDI FARAG, P.E., CHIEF, ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION
SUBJECT: NORTH ACCESS CONNECTION, lOTH AVENUE TUNNEL AMTRAK, BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN
Seelye Stevenson & Knecht, Engineers and Planners, have submitted plans with a letter dated November 10, 1983 for the above referenced project. The plans show re placement of a portion of existing 4'-0" X 2’-8" brick egg shaped sewer in 10th Avenue with a 30" R.C.P. class III sewer.
Enclosed is a set of plans and hydraulic computations. Please check if the proposed sewer has the same capacity as the existing sewer and relate your comments to this office as early as possible so that we can process the review of this project.
ENCLOSURE.
MAGDI FARAG, P.E., CHIEF Engineering Review Section
cc: Novotny Farag Aggarwal Suspense RA:lp
“1^1. H-n%3
NYC-WTC_000165837
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000165833
Letter from STV&K submitting revised engineering plans for the 10th Avenue tunnel project in accordance with DEP comments.
1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165840
Letter from engineers submitting revised plan sets in response to previous department comments on the tunnel project.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165835
Inter-departmental memorandum confirming that a proposed 30-inch RCP sewer has adequate capacity for the tunnel project.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165797
Letter from STV&K submitting revised utility and project drawings and sewer chamber computations to DEP, incorporating earlier department comments.
3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.967
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.964
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165844
Department of Environmental Protection review comments on 30% plan drawings requesting key plans, legends, and distance measurements.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165824
Department of Environmental Protection letter acknowledging receipt of 95% plans and referring comments previously sent to the consulting engineers.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165795
Letter from STV&K submitting revised drawings for utility work and structural computations for sewer chamber to DEP for review and approval.
3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.959
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165343
DEP Bureau of Sewers approves tunnel plans with no additional hydraulic objections and minor drafting corrections noted.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.957
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗No available related records indexed in this group.
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000165835
Inter-departmental memorandum confirming that a proposed 30-inch RCP sewer has adequate capacity for the tunnel project.
Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165835
Inter-departmental memorandum confirming that a proposed 30-inch RCP sewer has adequate capacity for the tunnel project.
Similarity score 0.987 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165403
Inter-office memorandum requesting hydraulic review of the proposed siphon in the Westside Connection Project.
Similarity score 0.979 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165384
Internal memorandum acknowledging receipt of 90% submission drawings for the Westside Connection Project and referencing hydraulic computations.
Similarity score 0.979 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165401
Inter-office memorandum inquiring if the proposed siphon concept in the 60% submission drawings is acceptable to the Bureau of Sewers.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165399
Internal memorandum inquiring whether the Bureau accepts the proposed siphon concept shown in the 60% submission drawings for the Westside Connection Project.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder