Department of Environmental Protection memo reviewing structural computations for a proposed sewer chamber, providing specifications for roof slab thickness and steel values.
NYC-WTC_000165786–000165789Folder label: “North Access Connection, AMTRAK 10th Ave. Tunnel”
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
S^r/SEELYE STEVENSON VA^E & KNECHT. A ENGINEERS & PLANNERS. 99 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK. NY. 10016 212/867-4000, Telex 64 9081 SSV&K
May 29, 1984
New York City Department of Environmental Protection Division of Sewer Regulation and Control Bureau of Sewers '1S'S 40 Worth Street New York, New York 10013 Attention: Mr. Fredrick Novotny, P.E. Chief, Division of Sewer Regulation and Control Y-"'
Reference: AMTRAK North Access Connection Tenth Avenue Tunnel Borough of Manhattan Subject: Structural computations for sewer chamber My Letter of May 11, 1984 SSV&K No.: 22-6018 Dear Sir:
Enclosed please find the subject computations which were omitted from enclosure with my letter of May 11, 1984. Very truly yours. STV/SEELYE STEVENSON VALUE & KNECHT
James P. Hynes, P.E. Project Manager
Enclosures: (1) Copy of structural computations of sewer chamber Copies to: R. Aggarwal - N.Y.C.D.E.P., Bureau of Sewers J. Brusko Central File (2) File/JPH
STV ENGINEERS, Engineer*, Architects, Planner*, Construction Managers. Pro/essiGna! Member Firms: STV/Baltimore Transportation Associates; STV/Lyon Associates; STV/Managerr.ent Consuilants Group; STV/ H. D Nottingham & Associates; STV/Sanders & Thomas; STV/Santafric; STV/Seelye Stevenson Value & Knecht.
NYC-WTC_000165787
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000165790
Letter provides specific design comments regarding roof slab thickness and removable slab configuration requirements.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.999
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.981
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.957
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165322
Department of Environmental Protection letter providing design review comments on tunnel project contract drawings, requesting pressure relief manhole details, existing sewer…
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.952
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.951
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165377
Letter from DEP Bureau of Sewers regarding unreviseed drawings and as-built records for the tunnel project.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.948
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165840
Letter from engineers submitting revised plan sets in response to previous department comments on the tunnel project.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.947
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000165536
March 15, 1982 DEP letter providing engineering requirements for a telephone manhole load above the proposed 13-inch sewer line.
1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.946
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗No available related records indexed in this group.
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder