NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
254 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
NYC-WTC_000146129–000146748Folder label: “EPA OIG LAW”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 7 of56 placed at each sampling location to collect different particle sizes Including resplrable (PM4 and PM2.5), thoracic (PMlO), and total lnhalable {PMlOO). This resulted In the collection of overlapping, or nested, particulate size fractions.
The particle size determines how deeply a particle can travel Into the respiratory tract. Resplrable particles with diameters of 4 microns or less (PM4) are very small particles that can be breathed In and can travel deeply Into the air sacs of the lung. At some locations another sampler was used that collected a smaller set of resplrable particles, those with diameters of 2Y2 microns (PM2.S) or less. Another sampler collected particles with diameters of 10 microns (PM10) or less. This sampler would collect not only resplrable particles, but also those slightly larger particles that tend to land In the upper regions of the respiratory tract, Including the throat. A fourth sampler collected a larger set of particles, those 100 microns (PM100) or less In diameter. The larger particles In this fraction can land In the nose and throat. Where a particle lands determines what types of health effects might be experienced. Particles too large to travel Into the narrower passages of the lower respiratory tract might deposit In the upper airways (e.g., the nose and throat) and cause Irritation. Similarly, larger particles might cause eye Irritation. If the settled surface dust contains sufficient amounts of particles of a very small size, then effects consistent with particles reaching the lower respiratory tract might occur (coughing, shortness of breath).
Each of the particulate air sample fractions was analyzed for crystalline minerals (quartz, crlstoballte, trldymlte, calcite, portlandlte, gypsum, mica, and halite). X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) Identifies a mineral by the unique diffraction pattern given off when the x-ray strikes Its surface. The diffraction pattern serves as a "flngerprlntn to Identify the mineral present.
Other air samples were screened for fibers using phase contrast microscopy (PCM) to count the total number of all fibers present. If the concentration of total fibers was higher than the maximum concentration of fibers found In the comparison homes (0.003 fibers per cubic centimeter of air) the sample was re-analyzed for asbestos by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to look for SVF If the PCM fiber counts was higher than 0.003 fibers per cubic centimeter {f/cc) and If the settled surface dust sample from that area contained SVF.
Settled Surface Dust Samples The composition of settled surface dust reflects particles and fibers that have been tracked Into an area or that were present In the air and have with time, deposited on surfaces. Settled surface dust was collected indoors using a specialized vacuum cleaner. Outside settled surface dust was collected by scooping any visible dust-type material Into a container. As with the air samples, the settled surface dust samples were analyzed to assess the presence of fibers and minerals. The analysis performed does not allow the determJnatlon of what size particles are present In the dust. The composition of the settled surface dust was evaluated to
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000146667
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
No available related records indexed in this group.
NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
254 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000094912
Invoice detailing billing for bulk and air sample analysis results including PLM, PCM, and TEM testing at 44 Wall Street.
21 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093400
A license agreement document regarding exterior cleaning services for the property at 65 Liberty Street.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000132519
A DEP results table showing daily asbestos air monitoring data at 100 Trinity Place from October to November 2001.
29 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000104846
Fax cover sheet transmitting permit application documents for work at 102 and 104 Greenwich Street to the NYC DEP on December 3, 2001.
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099112
Invoice from Fiber Control, Inc. dated November 27, 2002, for exterior cleanup services at multiple sites including 113 Nassau Street.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130799
Invoice from Benjamin Kurzban & Son Control, Inc. for roof work completed at 15 Dutch Street.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000113167
Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. for cleaning services on the facade of 54 Warren Street.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099818
Billing record for asphalt and gravel roof cleanup services performed at 55 Nassau Street in November 2002.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000119790
Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. for DEP environmental protection services at 14 Barclay Street.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000122774
An invoice from Fiber Control Inc. dated August 2002 for facade services performed at 179 Broadway.
11 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000121922
Invoice dated October 2002 for environmental remediation services performed on the exterior of 118 Chambers Street.
9 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.964 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.964 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.961 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176062
Report on air and settled dust analysis for crystalline minerals and fibers collected from residential units in October 2001.
Similarity score 0.954 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176156
Report enclosure detailing air and settled dust sampling results for Building 26, including PM size fraction analysis.
Similarity score 0.953 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.949 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Operational period plan from the FDNY detailing actions for December 21, 2001 at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Operational period plan from the FDNY detailing actions for December 21, 2001 at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000138846
OSHA transmits NYS DOL data report containing sample summaries and worker information for WTC.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer