NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
WY-20-2002 21! 45 U.S. EPAZDEPP 212 6373772 P.04Z09
Draft. Thank you so much for your help. ruge I UA 1
Morion, Lisette
From: Rutkin, Amy
Bene Friday, May 17.200211:55 AM
Tei Morten, Lisette
SubJsBt: PW: Draft, Thank you to much for your
—--Original Message——
From; Howard Bader Cmanto:hbaderi®nyc.rrxom3
Sent Thursday/ May 16,200210:25 PM
To: Rutidn, Amy
Subjects Rs: Draft. Thank you so much for your hdp.
Amy, 1 have to prepare for court testimony tomorrow {9am * 12 pm) so I was a little
rushed reviewing ^is. 1 think you did a good job covering the ki^ points. A few
comments’
Similar to the asbestos microvac samples, it should be emphasized that testing for
dioxin, lead, mercury and fibrous material is surface not air testing. Sample
quantities should be similar to asbestos air (except maybe dioxin which is
around $750 per sample). I don’t think the ultra fine particulate testing is very
relevant anymore, similar to benzene it was an airborne issue which doesn't appear
to exist anymore. Howard Bader.
— Original Message —
From;ayi!itQJm
To: 2igs2srWQnu!:.fi8n:
Sent Thursory, May iS. 2002 5:47 PM
Subject: Draft. Thank you so much for your help,
«EPA Scope of Work Comment* orefn.deo*
A** RUTKIN
U.S. Ce^jkMOMm Jtnele MUler (NV-M)
ttWartokS(..autotU 2434 Rayburn BuMi/^8
Maw Yam, my leeu WMhnsian, SC 20555
eMH«{202)2»se9$
Fa* BU) M7.7SS6 Fu (2CS) US-89ZI
. v*n<rM8O4km*iii>wtM.sv»
^/17/2002
NYC-WTC_000144815
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.