EPA response letter regarding WTC dust program, March 2003

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC' REGION 2 290 BROADWAY NEWYORK, NY 10007-1866

4,. ... 13 p - Ob MAR 1 1 Honorable Charles Rangel U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative Rangel:

Thank you for your letter of January 29,2003 concerning the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program that the EPA is jointly conducting with the City ofN^York’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), using disaster funding provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). hi particular, you sought information about several aspects of the Program on behalf of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health.

As you are aware, our goal is to protect lower Manhattan residents from potential exposures to residual dust feat may contain pollutants from fee collapse of fee World Trade Center (WTC) and to provide residents wife information feat will help them feel comfortable in their homes. EPA has received approximately 5,045 requests for cleaning and testing of apartments and an additional 1,219 requests for testing only. As you note in your letter, we have begun work on both categories.of requests. To date, over 1,568 apartments have been cleaned and tested, and 450 have been tested. Testing of 1589 residences addressed either by testing alone or cleaning and testing have revealed results below the EPA clearance level (see Note 1, Enclosure 1). Seventeen residences had samples feat exceeded the clearance level, and an additional fifty-five had results that could not be determined because of filter overload or other testing related problems (see Note 2, Enclosure 1).

One area of specific concern to you is personal protective equipment (PPE) for cleanup workers. I note that all work performed under the Program is being performed in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to regulations issued by EPA, the United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL), and DEP. The contract entered into by DEP for cleaning requires that only a NYSDOL-licensed asbestos contractor and only DEP and NYSDOL-certified workers would be allowed to perform any of the cleaning activities under this contract. This requirement also applies to any subcontractors involved in the cleaning. The contract entered into by DEP for fee project monitors (who are responsible for, among other things, overseeing fee cleaning work and insuring feat work is satisfactorily completed) requires fee use of experienced personnel.monitors certified by New York State. I also note feat we have worked with OSHA to assure feat contractors meet OSHA regulatory requirements. For instance, pursuant to our discussions wife OSHA, we have implemented personal air monitoring for a specified number of the cleaning employees (see Note 3, Enclosure 1).

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.opa.gov RecycledZRscycIaWs • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based *Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 50% Poetconsumer content)

‘ NYC-WTC_OOO151555