NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 8 pages

Asbestos air sampling flow rate specifications, Feb 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Technical discussion regarding discrepancies in NIOSH method flow rates and requirements for large sample volumes at 114 Liberty Street.

NYC-WTC_000162890–000162897

Folder label: “E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162890
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Maddaloni. Mark@epamail .epa.gov Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:10 PM To: Theodorellys, Penny Cc: [email protected]; Radhakrishnan, Krish; Gilsenan, Michael Subject: Re: 114 Liberty Street Monitoring Contractor Specifications

114 Liberty St Monitoring 2 6... Penny, There are still a few loose threads re: the asbestos air sampling rates.

Page 2 (Equipment) The protocol calls for pumps with a flow rate capacity of 2 - 10 liters/min but bullet #6 on page 5 (NIOSH 7400 method) calls for a flow rate of 10 - 15 liters per min. On a related subject, the NIOSH 7400 method specifies a flow rate of .5 - 16 liters/min (and a minimum volume of 400 liters) but we want the large (3,600 liter) sample volumes, and therefore high flow rates (approx 10 liters/min), to attain the necessary detection limits for the TEM analysis.

Page 4 (Asbestos Air Monitoring) bullet # 2 The protocol calls for a flow rate not to exceed 3 liters/min. At that rate it would take 20 hours to get the desired sample volume of 3,600 liters.

"Theodorellys, Penny" To: Mark Maddaloni/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles <ptheodorellys@de Nace/R2/USEPA/US@EPA p.nyc.gov> cc: "Radhakrishnan, Krish" <[email protected]>, "Gilsenan, Michael" 02/06/2003 02:53 <mgilsenan@dep .nyc.gov> PM Subject: 114 Liberty Street Monitoring Contractor Specifications

<<114 Liberty St Monitoring 2 6 O3.doc»

Attached please find the revised monitoring specification with your comments included. I am awaiting the attachments referenced in your correspondence and will include your reporting guidelines. We will be moving forward quickly and I would appreciate any other feedback as soon as possible.

Thanks again, the inclusion of the language for the changes was very helpful.

Please confirm receipt and review of this document.

1

NYC-WTC_000162890

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162890Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →