NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 08/NADLER
Document / 109 pages

WTC document preservation notice, NYC Law Department

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Standard administrative notice requiring the retention of original World Trade Center records as evidence for future legal actions.

NYC-WTC_000144741–000144849

Folder label: “NADLER

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000144804
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

TO 917185954544 P.03/08 JULr29-2002 17:52 FROM US EPA REGION 2 ORC

2

indoor air contaminants in residences north of 59^^ Street, which were not affected by the collapse of the WTC, so that such data may be compared with data obtained in residences in lower Manhattan. The contractor is in place for this study, and access has been granted for some of the sampling locations. Third, EPA, along with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP), is providing for the monitoring and cleaning of lower Manhattan residences tlirough the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program - World Trade Center (WTC) Dust Cleanup. Pursuant to interagency agreements under the Stafford Act, FEMA is providing or will provide funds to the city, which used its emergency contracting authority to enter into contracts for a hotline contractor to register residents for the indoor dust cleaning program, and will be contracting vdth certified asbestos cleanup contractors to professionally clean apartments, as well as with Project Monitors to oversee the cleaning contractors. The actual cleaning and. monitoring will be carried out by NYCDEP contractors, under the direction and oversight of EPA, in coordination with the city. FEMAand EPA are in the process of entering into an interagency agreement to support EPA’s activities in this program.

We will evaluate the infonuation and data that we gather in the Confiimation Study and the Background Study, as well as the results of a peer review of a draft technical document on World Trade Center Contaminants of Potential Concern, as the cleaning and monitoring activities proceed. We will use these data to determine whether any program adjustments or modifications are needed. As we have discussed, this approach of conducting studies and cleanups in parallel is necessary because of the scientific complexities of dealing with indoor environments and the need for timely response to the potential threat to public health and welfare. We have limited indoor sampling protocols, health bendmarks, background data for urban areas (especially Manhattan), correlations of dust to air exposures, etc. We are using cleanup methods effective for asbestos and fibrous materials and expect that these will be effective for any other particulate matter that may pose health concerns. We will do sampling for airborne asbestos in every residence we are asked to clean or test, but we will also do sampling for metals and dioxin in a subset of spaces. This will give us information on additional substances of potential concern. If the study work we are doing indicates that we need to modify our cleanup approach, we will do so. But at this time we feel it is appropriate to begin to clean residential spaces.

As you are aware, under the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program -WTC Dust Cleanup, lower Manhattan residents will be given the option of requesting either cleaning followed by sampling, or sampling alone. To date, more than 3,500 residents have requested one or the other option.

Relationship of the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program to the National Contingency Plan

You have asked whether the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program - WTC Dust Cleanup will be conducted in a manner consistent with the NCP. As I noted in my April 25

NYC-WTC_000144804

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000144804Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →