NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000199811

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000199811
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000199811
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

SB BSSB

TABLE 2. Summary of locations with asbestos or synthetic vitreous fibers in settled surface dust Sampling locations that had either asbestos in the dust by PLM or TEM analysis or SVF in the settled surface dust by PLM analysis are included. Ranges of asbestos and SVF values for each type of location are included. Number of Range of Number of Range of Sampling Locations with Asbestos Locations SVF Found' Locations: Total Number of Asbestos in Found' with SVF in Lower Locations Sampled’ Settled Surface Settled Manhattan Dust Surface Dust (% of locations (% of detected)** locations detected)** Asbestos (PLM) = 14 Outdoor Asbestos (TEM) = 12 6 <17,^3.4 % 11 l%-72% SVF (PLM) = 14 (43%) (79%)

Asbestos (PLM) = 26 Common Asbestos (TEM) = 25 5 <1%-1.5% 14 5% 27% SVF (PLM) = 26 (19%) (54%)

Asbestos (PLM) = 57 Residential Asbestos (TEM) = 52 10 <1%-1.5% 26 2%-35%f SVF (PLM) = 57 (18%) (46%)

Asbestos (PLM) = 29 Whole Asbestos (TEM) =29 12 <l%-3.4% 21 2%-72% Building SVF (PLM) = 29 (41%) (72%)

Number of Range of Number of Range of Sampling Locations With Asbestos Locations SVF Found' Locations: Total Number of Asbestos in Found' With SVF in Comparison Locations Sampled’ Settled Surface Settled Buildings Dust Surface Dust (% of locations (% of detected)** locations detected)** Asbestos (PLM) = 3 Common Asbestos (TEM) = 3 0 None Detected 0 None SVF (PLM) =3 (0%) by PLM or (0%) Detected by TEM PLM Asbestos (PLM) = 5 Residential Asbestos (TEM) = 4 0 None Detected 0 None SVF (PLM) =5 (0%) by PLM or (0%) Detected by TEM PLM Notes: a. All dust samples were initially analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed to confirm the absence of asbestos if not detected by PLM analysis. b. The number of locations containing asbestos in dust reflects locations with asbestos detected by either PLM or TEM (reported as <1% or more). The percentage of locations with asbestos detected is calculated from the total number of dust samples. c. The range represents the highest value detected at a location (PLM or TEM). d. The percentage of locations with synthetic vitreous fibers (SVF) detected is calculated fi'om the number of SVF PLM samples. e. Some locations had an additional co-located sample obtained; the range shown considers the highest measured value for each sampling location. f. One residential unit had an extra settled surface dust sample (taken from a window sill), which contained 40% SVF by PLM.

CITY_21MC100_0 04054379

NYC-WTC_000199811

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000199811Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →