NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
NYC-WTC_000149537–000149682Folder label: “ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Table 6 Summary of Locations With Asbestos or Synthetic Vitreous Fibers (SVF) in Settled Surface Dust Sampling locations that had either asbestos in the dust by PLM or TEM analysis or SVF in the settled surface dust by PLM analysis. Ranges of asbestos and SVF values for each type of location are included._______________________ Number of Range of Number of Range of Sartqtling Locations with Asbestos Found* Locations with SVF Found Locations: Total Number of Asbestos in SVF in Settled Surface Dust Lower Locations Sampled* Settled Surface (% of Manhattan Dust locations (% of locations detected)** detected)’’ Asbestos (PLM) = 14 Outdoor Asbestos (TEM) = 12 6 <1%3.4 % 11 l%-72% SVF(PLM) = 14 (43%) (79%)
Asbestos (PLM) =26 Common Asbestos (TEM) =25 5 14 5%-27% SVF(PLM) = 26 (19%) (54%)
Asbestos (PLM) =57 Residential Asbestos (TEM) =52 10 26 2%-35% *■ SVFtPLM) = 57 (18%) (46%)
Asbestos (PLM) =29 Whole Asbestos (TEM) =29 12 <l%-3.4% 21 2%-72% Buildir^ SVF (PLM) = 29 (41%) (72%)
Number of Range of Number of Range of Sampling Locations With Asbestos Found** Locations SVF Found • Locations: Total Number of Asbestos in With SVF in Comparison Locations Sampled Settled Surface Settled Surface Dust Buildings Dust (%of (% of locations locations ^tected)” detected)** Asbestos (PLM) = 3 Common Asbestos (TEM) =3 0 None Detected 0 None Detected SVF (PLM) =3 by PLM or TEM (0%) by PLM (0%) Asbestos (PLM) =5 Residential Asbestos (TEM) =4 0 None Detected 0 None Detected SVF (PLM) =5 (0%) by PLM or TEM (0%) by PLM
Notes: a. All dust samples were initially analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed to confirm the absence ofasbestos if not detected by PLM analysis. b. The number of locations containing asbestos in dust reflects locations with asbestos detected by either PLM or TEM (reported as <1 % or more). The percentage of locations with asbestos detected is calculated from the total number of dust samples. 1 c. The range represents the highest value detected at a location (PLM oT TEM). d. The percentage of locations with synthetic vitreous fibers (SVF) detec'i'sd is calculated from the number of SVF PLM samples. e. Some locations had an additional co-located sample obtained, the range shown considers the highest measured value for each sampling location. *) f. One residential unit had an extra settled surface dust sample (taken from a wip)dow sill), which contained 40% SVF by PLM.
57
NYC-WTC_000149641
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149798
Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗41 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
25 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164784
Transmission of revised asbestos sampling results for residential samples collected November-December 2001.
24 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.986
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153220
Draft protocol outlining objectives and locations for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas.
16 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153258
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
17 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000159829
Coordination memo for WTC recovery inter-agency meeting on building and parks assessment and scope.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.999 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.971 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178388
Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
Similarity score 0.970 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.970 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.968 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000164671
Draft document titled World Trade Center Emergency Safety and Health Plan dated September 30, 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000152439
Letter from Con Edison to DEP regarding follow-up on water pumped from a gas main during the World Trade Center recovery.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000123875
Letter from environmental consultants summarizing ambient air sampling and cleanup activities at 225 Rector Place.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer