NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 26/No folder label
Document / 21 pages

Ambient Dust Sampling Protocol Near WTC, Oct 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.

NYC-WTC_000153258–000153278
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000153258
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document 1 -f S'

****Z)JMFr Fersfon 10» October 29,2001**** Ambient and Indoor Sampling for Publ> Health Evaluations of Residential Areas Near WTC

L Introduction:

This sampling protocol was developed to assess potential exposures to airborne and settled surface dust that entered residential areas following tire collapse of tire World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. The collapse of the WTC buildings resulted in a large number of residents being evacuated from their homes. Since the collapse, some residents have not reoccupied their apartments/homes near the WTC. Many of these residents have either visited to assess damage or to clean. Many have reoccupied their homes, and it is anticipated that more residents will soon be moving back. To date, envirc sntal sampling efforts have focused on rescue/recovery areas (occupational); some sampling of commercial buildings to ensure office worker safety; and ambient (outdoor) air sampling for asbestos in a number of residential/commercial areas. Additional sampling is needed to assess possible WTC-related contaminants in residential areas-both indoors and outside.

Surface dust and debris containing asbestos have been found in lower Manhattan. Asbestos has been detected in personal air samples of‘‘hot-zone” workers, hi addition, low levels of asbestos have been detected in air samples collected on die “hot-zone” perimeter. Crystalline silica quartz has been detected in some of the 30 settled dust samples collected by NIOSH. Although most samples contained less than S%, some samples contained from 15-20% crystalline silica quartz. Of the twelve personal air samples from the work site that have been analyzed for respirable crystalline silica, no detectable levels were found.

Dust, bulk, and air samples (mostly on or near the work site), as well as surface runoff water, river sediment, and river water have been analyzed for other contaminants, including metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PAHs, dioxins and PCBs. The low levels of these contaminants that have been found do not indicate an immediate need to conduct widespread environmental testing for them.

Materials in airborne dust that may be of more immediate health concem-especially to residents who are returning to lower Manhattan-are those that can cause eye, nose, and throat irritation. Materials that can be inhaled or respired from airborne dust may cause respiratory irritation and exacerbation of pre-existing problems such as asthma, emphysema, and cardiopulmonary disease. Analysis of WTC-related residential surfrce and airborne dust, both indoors and ouidoors, is to 1) determine if residents are being exposed to concentrations of materials that may be of public health concern; 2) determine whether areas already cleaned (inside and outside environments) contain materials that may be of public health concern; and 3) provide information to the public on the potential health implications (or lack of implications) of the sample results.

Page 1 of

NYC-\/VTC_000153258

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000153258Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →