NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
254 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
NYC-WTC_000146129–000146748Folder label: “EPA OIG LAW”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 35 of56 were samples taken which showed fibers by PCM, which were not re-analyzed. Any of these air samples, especially those taken In areas with asbestos or SVF In the dust, may have some of these fibers as part of the PCM fiber count. Generally, the levels of dust and air did not indicate a consistent pattern at different locations. It was not possible to conduct a more accurate correlation analysis between asbestos and SVF material In settled surface dust and fibers In air because the majority of air samples were not analyzed specifically for asbestos or SVF (I.e., TEM or SEM analysis). The llmlted data gathered during this investigation does not support nor refute the assumption that all the fibers In the air samples wlll be asbestos or SVF even when asbestos was found In dust.
B. Publlc Health Evaluation
The potential for health effects Is possible after exposures to certain materials. An exposure to a material occurs when It comes Into contact with or is taken Into our bodies. The route of exposure is the method by which a material comes Into contact with the body (e.g., dermal contact, Inhalation, or Ingestion). The nature of the health effect will depend on the material involved, how It comes Into contact with the body, the amount of material (exposure level), the duration of the exposure, resultant dose, and the susceptlblllty of the Individual (e.g., pre-existing health conditions may make an individual more sensitive to a contaminant).
Inltlally, screening values were established and listed In the project-sampling plan. These screening values were established to provide a guideline for evaluating the data as It was collected for any Indication of a hazard requiring Immediate attention, and to ensure the proper analytical detection limit to support a chronic health evaluation. These screening values were not used In this report because this public health evaluation Is specific to the levels of materials found In the study area.
Because levels of asbestos, SVF, and some crystalline minerals are elevated in the settledsurface dust of some buildings in lower Manhattan, lndlvlduals may be exposed to those materials In their homes, out of doors, or at work either by direct contact or by Inhalation when the dust Is disturbed and suspended In the air. Depending on the environment, one or all of these materials may be present In the dust of an area.
1. Sensitive Populations
Sensitive populations are Individuals who may experience greater responses when exposed to a material than normally predicted. This sensitivity may be due to life stage, pre-existing medical or exposure conditions, or genetic susceptibility.
Children are considered a sensitive population for several reasons. The first consideration Is the potential for greater exposure than adults. With a lower body weight, and higher relative ventilation rate, chlldren have higher doses than adults given exposure to the same levels of materials In air, food, or drinking water. For bloperslstent materials, such as some of the minerals discussed
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003
NYC-WTC_000146695
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
No available related records indexed in this group.
NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
254 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000094912
Invoice detailing billing for bulk and air sample analysis results including PLM, PCM, and TEM testing at 44 Wall Street.
21 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093400
A license agreement document regarding exterior cleaning services for the property at 65 Liberty Street.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.984
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000132519
A DEP results table showing daily asbestos air monitoring data at 100 Trinity Place from October to November 2001.
29 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000104846
Fax cover sheet transmitting permit application documents for work at 102 and 104 Greenwich Street to the NYC DEP on December 3, 2001.
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099112
Invoice from Fiber Control, Inc. dated November 27, 2002, for exterior cleanup services at multiple sites including 113 Nassau Street.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130799
Invoice from Benjamin Kurzban & Son Control, Inc. for roof work completed at 15 Dutch Street.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000113167
Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. for cleaning services on the facade of 54 Warren Street.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000099818
Billing record for asphalt and gravel roof cleanup services performed at 55 Nassau Street in November 2002.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000119790
Invoice from Fiber Control Inc. for DEP environmental protection services at 14 Barclay Street.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000122774
An invoice from Fiber Control Inc. dated August 2002 for facade services performed at 179 Broadway.
11 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000121922
Invoice dated October 2002 for environmental remediation services performed on the exterior of 118 Chambers Street.
9 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000178388
Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
Similarity score 0.992 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.960 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.959 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.959 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.958 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178388
Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
Similarity score 0.950 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Operational period plan from the FDNY detailing actions for December 21, 2001 at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Operational period plan from the FDNY detailing actions for December 21, 2001 at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000138846
OSHA transmits NYS DOL data report containing sample summaries and worker information for WTC.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer