NYC Law Department letter regarding EPA draft report excerpts, July

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 10 of56 locations sampled, quartz was detected in 81 % of common areas and 53% of residences. Gypsum was seen In 88% of common areas and 79% of residences. Minerals were found In all lower Manhattan outdoor settled surface dust samples at estimated values ranging as high as 27%J quartz, 19%J calcite, 6%J portlandite, and 27%J gypsum. No visible settled outdoor dust was available In the comparison areas above 59th Street.

Several of the minerals detected in the settled surface dust samples, such as portlandlte and calcite, can make the dust more alkaline, or raise the pH. Only two dust samples provided enough material for the determination of pH. The samples, collected from two outdoor locations In lower Manhattan, had pH levels of 8.6 and 9.8. On the pH scale, values less than 7 are considered acidic, a value of 7 Is neutral, and values above 7 are alkaline or basic. Based on the results of the pH analyses, these dust samples are slightly alkaline. This is consistent with the detection of portlandlte and calcite (alkaline minerals present in concrete) in the mineral analysis of the dust sample from the same location.

Conclusions

Based upon the analytical results of samples taken between November 4 through December 11, 2001, and Information collected during the sampling effort, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry make the following conclusions (not In order of importance).

· Total fiber counts of air samples taken in lower Manhattan were similar to the comparison areas above 59th Street sampled during this Investigation. The six lower Manhattan areas that had elevated total fiber counts were re-examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM}. The TEM and SEM results indicated that neither asbestos nor SVF contributed to the elevated fiber counts.

• Low levels of asbestos were found In some settled surface dust, primarily below Chambers Street. Many of the lower Manhattan locations sampled had been previously cleaned prior to this investigation. No asbestos was detected In the comparison Indoor dust samples taken north of 59th Street. The City of New York has conducted follow-up activities at the locations where asbestos was detected in settled surface dust.. Only two follow-up locations, outdoor areas, required professional asbestos abatement. Following-up activity at the other locations did not find any asbestos containing materials.

· When compared with the results obtained from the comparison sampling locations, the lower Manhattan residential areas sampled by this Investigation tended to have a greater percentage of SVF (primarily fiberglass), mineral components of concrete (quartz, calcite, and portlandlte), and mineral components of building wallboard (gypsum, mica, and halite} in settled surface dust. However, the frequency of detections and prevalence patterns of

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003

NYC-WTC_000146670