NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
MAY-20-2002 21:45 U.S. EPh/DEPP 212 6373772 P.04/09
Draft, Thank you so much for your help. f»gc i Ui I
Morton, Lisette
From; Ruftin. Amy
Sant Friday, May 17. 2002 11-.55 AM
To: Morton, Lisette
Subject: FW; Draft, Thank you to much for your
-—-Original Message-—-
From; Howard Bader [[email protected]]
Sent Thursday, May 16,2002 10:2S PM
To; Rutten, Amy
Subject; Re: Draft. Thank you so much for your help.
Amy, 1 have to prepare for court testimony tomorrow (9am - 12 pm) so 1 was a little
rushed reviewing this. I think you did a good job coveting the k^ points. A few
comments:
Sixsilar to the asbestos microvac samples, it should be emphasized that testing for
dioxin, lead, mercury and fibrous material is surface not air testing. Sample
quantities should be similar to asbestos air (except maybe dioxin which is
around $750 per sample). I don’t think the ultra fine particulate testing is very
relevant anymore, similar to benzene it was an airborne issue which doesn't appear
to exist anymore. Howard Bader.
— Original Message —»
From; StHSSHLAmy
To: j2msrl@!3ys.£!lSSa)I
Sent Thursday, May i«. 2002 5;47 PM
Sufajeet; Draft. Thank you so much for your hel?,
«EPA Scope of Work Comments oram.doo*
AMV RUTKiN
CNerofSof^
U.S. COAgrMtman J<rr«(e Nu«rtNV-9S}
201 Variek SI.. Suite S63 2J3^ Rayburn Buiding
NewYow.MV leoM wwhneion. DC 20515
PhO'e (2121367.7350 Pnore (202) 225-SS35
Fa* (212) 387-7SS6 Fax (2C2) WS-GS23
ai»iy.r«)tMndm»i>.aura.9o«
^/17/2002
NYC-WTC_000144824
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.