NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
MAY-20-2002 21:45 U.S. EPAzDEPP 212 6373772 P.04Z09
Drait, Thank you so much for your help. fttgc i Ui 1
Morton, Lisette
From: Rutkift. Amy
Sent: Friday, May 17.200211 -.55 AM
To; Morton, Lisette
Subject: FW; Draft Tl^enk you so much ter your
-—-Original Message——
From: Howard Bader (mailtozhbederl^nyc.rr^omj
Sent: Thursday, May X6,200210:25 PM
To: Rutidn, Amy
Subjects Re: Dreft. Thank you so much for your help.
Amy, I have to prepare for court testimony tomorrow (9am * 12 pm) so 1 was a little
rushed reviewing this. I think you did a good job covering the ki^ points. A few
comments'
SiroHar to the asbestos microvao samples, it should be .emphasized that testing for
dioxin, lead, mercury and fibrous material is surface not air testing. Sample
quantities should be similar to asbestos air (except maybe dioxin which is
around $750 per sample). I don’t think the ultra fine particulate testing is very
relevant anymore, similar to benzene it was an airborne issue which doesn’t appear
to exist anymore. Howard Bader.
— Oriflinal Message —
Prom; Rmkin.
To: li]xaaerl@nysl!l£Saf
Sent: Thuratiry, May ie, 2002 5;47 PM
Subject: Draft Thank you so much for your help,
«EPA Scope of Work Comments oraFtl.Ooo'
AMVRUTiCiN
Chief of SHtf
U.S. CongnMwmsn JtMfile fNV-Oa)
2O5VariBi<St..3ute8M JJ34 ftayhuw BuMino
New VeiK NY 160U Wnhneten. OC 20SiS
Afio,-’ePl2)3e7.nS8 Piwre (202) 22S-S635
F««BU)387’7SSS f W (2C2) m-6923
. e«ny.nittSn®rnati.f»u»o.8o»
5/17/2002
NYC-WTC_000144745
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.