NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 50/130 CEDAR STREET
Document / 321 pages

Asbestos and lead survey report cover, 130 Cedar Street, July

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Cover page for a survey report detailing asbestos and lead-based paint findings at 130 Cedar Street.

NYC-WTC_000125204–000125524

Folder label: “130 CEDAR STREET

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000125211
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Asbestos and Lead Paint Inspection Report for 130 Cedar Street, New York, NY 10006

is 2.1 ASBESTOS INSPECTION & BULK SAMPLING PROCEDURES:

The asbestos inspection procedures were based on the guidelines established by the Asbestos Hazardous Emergency Response Act (AHERA), as set forth in 40 CFR Part 763 of October 30, 1987. The AHERA guidelines represent the most up-to-date inspection and sampling protocol available and as such were utilized during the inspection and sampling. For the purposes of this inspection, suspect ACM has been placed in three (3) material categories: Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI), Surfacing Materials and Miscellaneous Materials.

All accessible areas of the building at 130 Cedar Street were inspected physically, functional space by functional space and homogeneous area-by-homogeneous area to determine the presence or absence of asbestos-containing materials. No demolition was done for sampling purposes because the facilities are fully operational and are currently being used by building occupants. Electrical wiring insulation was not sampled or inspected because electric power could not be shut off.

Suspect materials that may be present inside wall cavities, electrical wiring or which were otherwise inaccessible were not included in the scope of this inspection. Core samples of friable and non-friable suspect materials were collected by penetrating the suspect material to its substrate. The bulk samples collected were placed in sealed containers, labeled with an identifying code and a sample log was kept. Representative samples of each sampling area were then submitted to the laboratory to be analyzed for asbestos content. The inspection Involved the following tasks:

1. A visual determination as to the extent of visible and accessible suspect materials and conditions of the material. 2. Collection of suspect building materials for asbestos content. 3. All suspect friable and nonfriable materials were quantified in their respective locations. 6. All suspect materials sampled were identified on the appropriate building floor plan diagram with an identifying sample number. 7. A Chain of Custody record was prepared to accompany bulk samples to the laboratory.

The assessment process includes classifying the material as Friable ACM or Non-Friable ACM. Friable ACM is the term given to any material that contains more than one percent (1%) asbestos by weight and can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand or mechanical pressure. The word "Friability" refers to a material's likeliness to release airborne fibers when in situ, or under mechanical pressure. There is a greater possibility that a friable material will release fibers into the air when disturbed than will a non-friable material (i.e., floor tiles, roofing materials, etc.) thereby causing a potential hazard.

Prepared for Masterworks Development Corp. By JLC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Project No. 04-3271 Page 6

NYC-WTC 000125211

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000125211Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →