NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 1 page

Legal review status for emergency WTC work, Feb 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Notification that the Law Department has not approved emergency work, requiring modification of the proposed project timeline.

NYC-WTC_000162831

Folder label: “E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162831
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Schiano, Frank Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:46 PM To: Smyth, Virginia; Fenves, Carol Co: Gilsenan, Michael; Hoffer, Mark Subject: RE: Schedule A's for 114 Liberty St.

Virginia, the Law Department has not approved doing this work on an emergency basis. So, your timeline may have to be modified.

—Original Message— From: Smyth, Virginia Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:32 PM To: Schiano, Frank; Fenves, Carol Cc: Gilsenan, Michael Subject: Schedule A's for 114 Uberty SL Attached are Schedule A's for the cleaning and air monitoring contracts being prepared for 114 Liberty. Basically, they are the same as the ones finalized for 125 Cedar Street. Please let me know if any changes are required. I am also attaching a draft scope of work for the cleaning contract. As you know, we have extremely tight time contraints, in order to meet FEMA's requirements for funding. Our timeline is as follows:

2/10/03 - Mailing of bid documents 2/18/03 - Mandatory pre-bid conference (walk-thru) 2/24/03 - Bid Opening 2/26/03 - Commence Work for Air Monitoring Contract 2/28/03 - Commence Work for Cleaning Contract

« File: SCHALBAM.wpd » « File: SCHALBCL.wpd »

1

NYC-WTC_000162831

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162831Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →