30 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.999
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Environmental lab report distribution, May 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
NYC-WTC_000162222–000162238Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
BW = Body weight (kilograms) AT = Averaging time (days)
Several assumptions are incorporated into these equations. They assume that volatilization of the chemical on the surface is negligible, and that the chemical is available on the surface for the entire exposure duration (that is, that the chemical on a surface is not carried away each time the surface is touched). It is assumed that there is a maximum amount of chemical that can be deposited on skin (a maximum Ds) in a single day, but that maximum Ds is unknown. Therefore, this method tends to be conservatively biased with respect to oral and dermal exposure. If inhalation exposure is to be considered, the volatilized amount should be subtracted before estimating the amount available for dermal transfer.
Although these equations are limited by the above assumptions, they are basically sound in theory. The difficulty is in defining the specific inputs to the equations, since some of the input parameters have very little or no experimentally determined values in literature. Assessments usually rely on professional judgment.
The daily dose (Do and Dd above) is converted to a probability of carcinogenic risk by multiplying it by a carcinogenic slope factor (CSF). The CSF is a chemical-specific value indicating the risk per intake dose of that chemical.
?
The screening values developed for each potential indicator chemical are shown in five tables. Following each table is a summary of any contaminant-specific assumptions that were made in developing benchmark values.
NYC-WTC_000162227
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
27 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
30 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.976
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164862
Document introduction describing a cross-agency group tasked with identifying contaminants and establishing health-based screening levels.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151128
Report establishing health-based screening levels for the indoor environment with cross-agency representation.
13 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000125845
Draft fact sheet from DOH and DEP addressing tenant concerns regarding asbestos fibers at 105 Duane Street.
21 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.963
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000154652
Internal tracking document for managing reports, comments, and actions related to environmental compliance cases.
11 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164830
DEP internal memo circulating draft EPA screening level standards for asbestos, fiberglass, and silica in indoor air and settled dust for agency comment.
4 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.960
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
17 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
17 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
A DEP report describing ambient outdoor air monitoring for asbestos in Lower Manhattan following the World Trade Center disaster.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000149199
Department of Environmental Protection advisory letter dated October 25, 2001, addressed to residents of Lower Manhattan.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer