39 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.982
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗EPA interim final report on WTC background study, April 2003
Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
NYC-WTC_000145869–000146029Folder label: “INTERIM FINAL April 2003”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Do = Oral dose (mg/kg/day) BW= Body weight (kilograms) FTSM= Fraction transferred fi-om skin to mouth AT = Averaging time (days) ABSo = Oral absorption fraction
The surface concentration term (C) was assumed to remain constant over the entire 30 year exposure period. This is probably not true for surfaces in the residences impacted by the WTC attack. Surface loadings will decline as a result of volatilization, chemical degradation, surface cleaning and transfers to skin/clothing. While some redeposition will also occur, the net long term effect should be a gradual decline. In this sense, the method will overestimate exposures. This same issue has been recognized in similar assessments involving building clean-ups and pesticide exposures:
Two scenarios were considered in developing the procedures used to develop re-entry guidelines for the Binghamton State Office Building (Kim and Hawley, 1985). One assumed a constant surface concentration and the other assumed a first order exponential decay. The OPP guidance (EPA, 1997a and EPA, 2001a) uses a “dissipation” factor to account for degradation and other loss mechanisms after pesticide application. Similarly, Durkin et al (1995) has proposed a time-dependent transfer coefficient method for lawn treatment pesticides. Michaud et al (1994) proposed a mass balance model which accounts for losses from surfaces associated with building clean-ups.
Thus, while methods have been proposed to deal with changes in surface residue strength over time, it is uncertain how well these apply to the situation in residences near WTC. Thus for purposes of this screening assessment, it was decided to assume constant levels.
4. Calculating Clearance Criteria In order to calculate a clearance criteria for wipe samples, the formulas identified above need to be rearranged to derive a concentration based on the target cancer risk or non-cancer hazard. The clearance criteria for settled dust, using a wipe sample, for each COPC can be calculated using the formula listed below and the exposure parameters listed in Table 3 in the body of the document.
Clearance criteria (mg/m2) = (TRxBWxAT) / f((Ddx CSFd) + (Dox CSFo)) xEFxED]
The other terms in this procedure and associated uncertainties are discussed below:
Exposed Skin Surface Area (SAI The skin surface area of400 cm^ is a typical value for the palm side of adult hands (EPA, 1997b) which is the body part that is most likely to contact surfaces.
Contact Frequency (CFI Michaud et al (1994) assumed 8 contacts per day, apparently based on professional judgment. Low-end values of 1/day and "worst-case" rates of 24/day (3/hour) may be assumed as a matter
3
NYC-WTC_000146001
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000162222
EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
30 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.976
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
44 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗30 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
32 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149537
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
24 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗23 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000162222
EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
Similarity score 0.962 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
Similarity score 0.960 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.953 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.951 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.951 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
Similarity score 0.949 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Buildings in this record
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
- 110 Liberty Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 94
- 290 Broadway · 2 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 1
Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000106330
Letter reporting asbestos testing results for air and dust at Borough of Manhattan Community College in February 2002.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000152825
Draft protocol establishing procedures for evaluating airborne and settled dust in residential and commercial areas near the World Trade Center.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer