18 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗WTC health criteria appendix, Dec 2001
Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
NYC-WTC_000176140–000176155
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
AT =Averaging time (days)
Dd =(Ds X (1 - FTSM) x ABSd) / (BW x AT)
Dd =Dermal dose (mg/kg/day) FTSM= Fraction transferred from skin to mouth ABSd= Dermal absorption fraction BW =Body weight (kilograms) AT =Averaging time (days)
Several assumptions are incorporated into these equations. They assume that volatilization of the chemical on the surface is negligible, and that the chemical is available on the surface for the entire exposure duration (that is, that a previous transfer of contaminant from surface to skin would not deplete the amount of surface contamination). It is assumed that there is a "maximum Ds"; that is, that there would be a limit on how much contaminant could be transferred to the skin in a single day, but that maximum Ds is unknown. Therefore, this method tends to be conservatively biased with respect to oral and dermal exposure. If inhalation exposure is to be considered, the volatilized amount should be subtracted before estimating the amount available for dermal transfer.
Although these equations are limited by the above assumptions, they are basically sound in theory. The difficulty is in defining the specific inputs to the equations, since some of the input parameters have very little or no experimentally determined values in the literature. Previous assessments have usually relied upon professional judgment.
For that reason, it was felt that the multiple risk-based level approach, based on the range of possible inputs, was appropriate. RME assumptions were selected, along with "low-end" and "worst-case" values, in an attempt to bound the estimated RME risks.
Concentration of Chemical on Surface (C)
This is the parameter that was be derived for each scenario, and is compared with the site data.
Exposed Skin Surface Area (SA)
Skin surface areas have been well-defined in the experimental literature. The Exposure Factors handbook is a good source. For adult workers, some percentage of the total surface area is usually appropriate. The use of protective gear by industrial and maintenance workers, such as masks and gloves, is possible, but it depends upon the specific type of work and is a case-by- case decision.
10
CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_21MC100_003423737 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008
NYC-WTC_000176149
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
17 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000186132
Draft document outlining health effects screening criteria for ambient air developed by EPA Region 2 in October 2002.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000162222
EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.968
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160878
EPA notice of chain-of-custody and benchmarks presentation for WTC Taskforce meeting on April 8, 2002.
11 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.957
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000125845
Draft fact sheet from DOH and DEP addressing tenant concerns regarding asbestos fibers at 105 Duane Street.
15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151128
Report establishing health-based screening levels for the indoor environment with cross-agency representation.
9 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.951
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164862
Document introduction describing a cross-agency group tasked with identifying contaminants and establishing health-based screening levels.
11 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.950
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000107277
Transmission journal record confirming receipt of asbestos and lead analysis data on November 14, 2002.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.950
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
Similarity score 0.979 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
Similarity score 0.953 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.942 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.926 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.919 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.916 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000162222
EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000186132
Draft document outlining health effects screening criteria for ambient air developed by EPA Region 2 in October 2002.
Similar indexed content