NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
• B
In cases where appropriate standards did not exist (e.g., asbestos), risk-based criteria were
developed using established EPA risk assessment methods: for indoor air, methods described in
ERA’S “Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund” [RAGS, 1989] were used; for settled dust,
EPA Region Ill’s “Wipe Sample Assessment” guidance was utilized with modifications (see
Appendix D). The risk-based criteria reflect the most current toxicity criteria (Cancer Slope
Factors and RfDs/RfCs) on EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), which is a
regularly updated (quarterly), online database that reports chemical toxicity reference values and
information on human health effects that may result from exposure to chemicals in the
environment.
For contaminants that lacked IRIS verified toxicity criteria, occupational standards were
employed. Additional safety factors were added to account for higher exposure and greater
sensitivity within the general population.
The clearance criteria paradigm described above is pathway and chemical specific. Accordingly,
the benchmarks for each COPC do not account for multimedia and multiple chemical exposure.
Individual sampling results that exceed benchmark values should not be interpreted to represent
the occurrence of an adverse health effect. Because benchmark levels assume continuous
exposure for an extended duration, the average of the measured concentrations is more
appropriate for evaluating risk than individual measurements. Consequently, isolated individual
values above the benchmark level may not necessarily be indicative of a hazard.
Developing Risk-Based Criteria for Indoor Air
For carcinogenic compounds, the benchmarks were set so that a local resident’s lifetime risk of
developing cancer from exposure to WTC-related contaminants would not exceed a one-in-ten-
thousand probability (1x10'^) above the resident’s background risk without this exposure. The
amount of time that residents and office workers were exposed to WTC-related contaminants is
unknown. To be conservative, the Tier I screening level was chosen to be protective of a resident
who may have been exposed to WTC-related contaminants for one year. The Tier III clearance
level was chosen to be protective of a resident who is exposed to WTC-related contaminants for
30 years, which is the upper-bound estimate for residency in one dwelling [EPA, 1989]. Cancer
risk fi’om less-than-lifetime inhalation exposure is given as:
Risk = LAC* UR
where LAC is the air concentration averaged over a lifetime, calculated as: AC * [EF*ED/LT],
where AC is the average air concentration during the period of exposure (pg/m^), EF is the
exposure frequency (days/year), ED is the exposure duration (years), LT is lifetime (days), and
UR is the unit risk factor, expressed in units of 1/concentration.
The following table lists the input parameters and numerical values (along with a brief
explanation) used in this procedure. (See Appendix D for equations and a more detailed
discussion).
12
CITY_21MC100_002452163
NYC-WTC_000199592
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.