39 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.982
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗EPA interim final report on WTC background study, April 2003
Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
NYC-WTC_000145869–000146029Folder label: “INTERIM FINAL April 2003”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Averaging Time (AT) For non-carcinogens, AT is the exposure duration expressed in days. For carcinogens, exposure is averaged over a 70-year lifetime (the factor on which the cancer slope factors are based), and the AT is 70 years, in days (25,550).
Dermal Absorption Fraction (ABSd) This parameter is chemical-specific. Dermal absorption fractions of 0.06 for PCBs and 0.03 for dioxins from soil were first proposed in USEPA, 1992 and more recently adopted in EPA 2001b. Michaud et al (1994) used 0.02 for dioxins and 0.03 for PCBs uptake from a sooty surface, based on the ranges of estimated ABSd values for soil. The Binghamton panel used a range of values for PCBs (0.01, 0.1, and 0.5) and dioxins (0.01 and 0.1) (Kim and Hawley, 1985).
Reported ranges for dermaruptake for PCBs in solvent vehicles are reported to range from 15 to 56%, with most of the values clustering around 20% (ATSDR, 1993). Reported ranges for 2,3,7,8-TCDD in solvent vehicles are reported to range from 1 to 40% (ATSDR, 1988). Therefore, it seems that even if absorption from the wall material might be enhanced by residual solvent, the maximum possible absorption of 100% would be unrealistic even for worst-case exposure.
The values recommended here of 3% for dioxins and 13% for PAHs are based on EPA, 2001b.
Toxicity Values There are two toxicity values that can be used to calculate screening values, a Reference Dose (RfD) for non-carcinogenic compounds and a Cancer Slope Factor (CSF) for carcinogenic compounds. The RfD is defined as an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of a daily oral exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. It can be derived from a NOAEL, LOAEL, or benchmark dose, with imcertainty factors generally applied to reflect limitations of the data used. The CSF is defined as an upper bound, approximating a 95% confidence limit, on the increased cancer risk from a lifetime exposure to an agent. This estimate, usually expressed in units of proportion (of a population) affected per mg/kg/day, is generally reserved for use in the low-dose region of the dose-response relationship, that is, for exposures corresponding to risks less than 1 in 100. As the cancer endpoint was more sensitive, CSFs were used instead of RflDs. The CSFs used to calculate the clearance criteria are: 1.0 E+6 for dioxin (Dioxin Reassessment, EPA, 2001) and 7.3 E+0 for PAHs (IRIS, 2002).
5
NYC-WTC_000146003
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000162222
EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
30 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.976
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
44 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗30 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
32 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149537
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
24 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗23 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.952 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
Similarity score 0.945 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.942 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
Similarity score 0.942 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
Similarity score 0.939 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000186132
Draft document outlining health effects screening criteria for ambient air developed by EPA Region 2 in October 2002.
Similarity score 0.936 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Buildings in this record
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
- 110 Liberty Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 94
- 290 Broadway · 2 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 1
Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000148952
Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000106330
Letter reporting asbestos testing results for air and dust at Borough of Manhattan Community College in February 2002.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000152825
Draft protocol establishing procedures for evaluating airborne and settled dust in residential and commercial areas near the World Trade Center.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer