NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 10/Q and A FAQ
Document / 76 pages

Q&A and FAQ regarding WTC response, Oct 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Frequently asked questions and updates regarding disaster assistance, road reopenings, and victim support funds issued in October 2001.

NYC-WTC_000148115–000148190

Folder label: “Q and A FAQ

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000148133
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document MAY-29-2002 21:22 U.S. EPA/DEPP 212 6373772 P.02/03

Memo To; Kathy Callahan, Director, Division of Environmental Plamung and Protection From: Mark Maddaloni, Toxicologist/Risk Coordinator Date: 2/14/02 Subject: World Trade Center (WTC) Asbestos Issues (Draft)

Cr.iiained wid m are Q & A’s that address WTC-related asbestos issues.

1. (Usp of PCM-equivalent data from Manhattan for comparison with Libby)

Issue • It has been argued that fibers less than 5 microns (um) in length may cause cancer.

Response - EPA currently utilizes the cancer potency (i.e. inlialation Slope Factor) on its consensus data base, the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), to determine cancer risk from asbestos. This Slope Factor is intended for use with phase contrast microscopy (PCM) fibers only (>5 um length) because the epidemiology studies that formed the basis of the dose­ response assessment (i.e.. Slope Factor) utilized PCM analysis. EPA recognizes, and has acted upon (as described below), the uncertainty related to asbestos risk assessment, especially the factors that contribute to its cancer potency, and is currently re-evaluating the scientific literature on asbestos. For example, EPA is prep^dng to peer review a scientific approach that assigns greater carcinogenic potential to extremely long fibers (>10 um), but this methodology continues use of 5 um as the minimum fiber length for carcinogenic potential. As part of this initiative, EPA has convened international workshops to evaluate the relationship between fiber dimension/mineralology and the full range (carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic) of asbestos- related health effects.

2. (Comparison of Libby and Lower Manhattan data)

Issue - Contamination exists in an air duct at 105 Duane St. which is three blocks outside EPA ’ ’ defined “zone of contamination.”

Response - EPA never defined either a “zone of contamination” or an exclusion zone during the response to the WTC attack. The exclusion zone definitions, which have changed over time, have been determined by die City of New York. Additionally, the City of New York has taken the

1

NYC-WTC_000148133

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000148133Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000143952 · Box DEP Box 07

Joint announcement of a comprehensive plan by the EPA and city partners to address indoor air quality concerns in residential units south of Canal Street.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →