NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 05/EPA Cate Jenkins
Document / 24 pages

EPA memo re: asbestos assessment and Superfund advantages, Jan 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Memorandum comparing asbestos data in Manhattan to other sites and arguing for cleanup under the Superfund statute.

NYC-WTC_000140235–000140258

Folder label: “EPA Cate Jenkins

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000140235
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document I

« UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY f WASHINGTON, D.C, 20460

OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGB'JCY RESPONSE

MEMORANDUM

DATE: January 11,2002

SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT

1. Asbestos in Manhattan compared to Libby Superfund site

2. Why cleanup of WTC contamination is ineffective to date

3. Advantages of cleanup under Superfund statute

4. Summary risk assessment for WTC fallout

FROM: Cate Jenkins, Ph.D. [email protected] Waste Identification Branch (Mail Code 5304 W) Hazardous Waste Identification Division

TO: Affected Parties and Responsible Officials

This memorandum compares data for asbestos in settled dusts and air inside residences in the town of Libby, Montana, which is designated as a Superfund site due to this residential contamination, and similar data for the interior of buildings in Lower Manhattan contaminated by fallout from the World Trade Center (WTC). The reasons why the current cleanup of WTC dusts inside buildings is ineffective is also discussed, along with the advantages in addressing the cleanup through the Superfund statute.

In addition, this memorandum provides a summary of calculated cancer risks for occupancy of Lower Manhattan buildings, which was performed in more detail in my December 19,2001 memo.' Whereas high level EPA and NYC officials have stated in sworn testimony and to the press that there were no such risks,^ the appropriate offices in EPA have been effectively proscribed from conducting such a preliminary evaluation.

The analyses, projections, and opinions in this memorandum represent my own professional judgement and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency, and has not been reviewed by EPA. This memorandum is not intended as any final or definitive assessment risks from continued and past exposures to asbestos in Manhattan.

NYC-WTC_000140235

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000140235Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000121065 · Box DEP Box 48

Summary of air and dust sampling results collected from private residences and common areas at 250 South End Avenue.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

NYC-WTC_000117325 · Box DEP Box 46

Single page document header identifying the subject property as 250 South End Avenue with associated block and lot numbers.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →