NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 08/NADLER
Document / 109 pages

WTC document preservation notice, NYC Law Department

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Standard administrative notice requiring the retention of original World Trade Center records as evidence for future legal actions.

NYC-WTC_000144741–000144849

Folder label: “NADLER

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000144807
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document TO 917185954544 P.06/08 JUL-29-2002 17555 FROM US EPR REGION 2 ORC

5

We are responding to residents’ concerns in a manner consistent with the NCP. [See, for example. Section 3C0.415(n) of the NCP, 40 C.F.R. § 300.415(n) (“Community relations in removal actions”).] hi brief:

(a) we have designated spokespersons for our programs related to the attack on the WTC, who respond to inquiries and keep the community informed regarding our actions. They will make available data related to indoor air concerns in lower Manhattan, providing such data in a manner that does not divulge the address of a given residence or the name of a given resident;

(b) we have been meeting and will continue to meet with public interest groups or i' other interested or affected parties, as appropriate, to solicit their concerns and j information needs, and find out how or when citizens would like to be involved in / the process; /

(c) we are preparing a communications strategy which will address many of the concerns raised in the meetings with community members and other relevant information and will specify the community relations activities that we expect to undertake during the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program -WTC Indoor Dust Cleanup; and

(d) we have established at least one local information repository in lower Manhattan (290 Broadway) which is accessible to the public. At that location we will make available documents wliich have fonned the basis for our actions.

Working with the city we have made changes to the scope of work which will fonn the basis of the city’s'contractor solicitation for the cleanup and testing program based on concerns raised by interested members of the public.

We have developed the clearance level (that is. the risk-based clean up goal) to determine when cleaning can cease at a residence under the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program -WTC Dust Cleanup. The development of this level has been consistent with the NCP. For example, under the NCP, removals performed either by EPA witli Superfund monies or by responsible parties need to attain applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) “to the extent practicable considering the exigencies of the situation.” [Section 300.4150) of the NCP, 40 C.F.R. § 300.415(j).] For the Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program -WTC Dust Cleanup, it was determined that there were no directly applicable standards. So, as is a common practice in removal actions under the NCP. we have developed a risk-based clearance number for asbestos in air, taking into consideration other standards. We have consulted with peers in the scientific community to assure that this level represents an extremely protective long-term risk guideline.

NYC-WTC_000144807

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000144807Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →