NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 52/80 GOLD STREET Block: 94 Lot: 1 BIN: 1083349 100 BEEKMAN STREET, BUILDING #6
Document / 4 pages

Asbestos inspection report, 90 Gold Street, July 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Asbestos inspection report for the roof and facade of 90 Gold Street conducted on July 18, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000128186–000128189

Folder label: “80 GOLD STREET Block: 94 Lot: 1 BIN: 1083349 100 BEEKMAN STREET, BUILDING #6

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000128186
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Asbestos Inspection Report Page 1 of _l, Premise # Date of Inspection 90 Beekman Street 07/18/2002 Floor Zip Block Lot # Boro Code Roof & facade 10006 19 11 1 Inspector Badge # Squad # Basis of Inspection Building Type Pictures Carl Lutchmedial A058 I WTC A no Contractors Name Sample # NA Address Sample # NA City State Zip Sample # NA Laboratory Name Building Owner Southbridge Towers Inc Address Address 90 Beekman St City State Zip City State Zip NY NY 10038 Contact Person At Site Time of Inspection Toni D'Egidio — Building Manager 3pm — 4 pm On arrival I met with MS Toni D'Egidio the General Manager of Southbridge Towers. She discussed the concerns of the residents which were as follows: - If the commercial building (Footlocker) has to be cleaned, why not their building. - The dust and debris went everywhere, maybe their buildings needs another inspection. - Why isn't the City cleaning their building? She was informed of the following: - The DEP conducted inspections of the roofs and facades and did not see any visible accumulations of WTC debris. - Wipe sampling is not being to determine the presence of ACM. This is not an approved method of sampling to determine the presence of bulk ACM. - Only buildings with visible accumulations of WTC debris are being cleaned. - DEP visited various apartments based on complaints and did not observe WTC debris in the apartment, window ledge, or porch. We (including the Super - Anthony) then went to the Footlocker roof and debris was observed ONLY under a duct that ran the east — west length of the south side roof. Looking down from the roof at the facade did not reveal any debris. The roof of building #2 was also inspected and no debris observed. These buildings have gravel roofs. I specifically checked various cracks to see if there might be trapped debris, and did not see any. This roof was selected because it was the closest to WTC. Looking down from the roof to the porch of various apartments did not reveal any debris.

Based on my observations and previous DEP inspections no decontamination is required at these buildings.

NOV # I I I I I I Result Code NA I I I 5 NOV # Sup i NA Boro Code 1= Manhattan 2 = Bronx 3= Brooklyn 4= Queens 5= Staten Island Bldg. Type A> 6 Stories B <6 Stories C - Single Family D - School E - Hospital F — Public Owned Property Result Codes 1= Violation Issued 2 = No Violations Issued 3 = No Access 4= Project Not Started 5= Project Completed

NYC-WTC 000128186

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000128186Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →