NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 31/Buildings 105 Duane 80 John Gateway etc. 75 Park 200 Rector Trinity Church
Document / 2 pages

Letter regarding exterior facade cleaning concerns, Jun 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 92%

Correspondence expressing concern that only one non-residential building was scheduled for exterior facade cleaning while interior apartment cleaning was proceeding.

NYC-WTC_000154783–000154784

Folder label: “Buildings 105 Duane 80 John Gateway etc. 75 Park 200 Rector Trinity Church

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000154783
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Southbridge Towers, Inc. 90 Beekman Street, New York, New York 10038 * Tel (212)267-6190 *Fax (212)267-8995 * SBTowers1®aol.com SeftKfuryintMt AMaw June 10,2002 JodyWoOlKm Vmim KoUaWarahay ammr Mr. Robert C. Avaltroni JofmFratta AtstTt9^aunr New York City Department of Environmental Protection ArtynelMshner 59-17 Junction Boulevard, 11* floor Corona, New York 11368 Gregory Cooper PauiHovitz Joseph Morrone Re: Southbridge Towers, Inc/80 Gold St./ 55 Fulton St/ Foot Locker John Oat Carlo Peoorart Moffle Perrone Lolly Sullivan Dear Mr. Avaltoni: Louis Trazlno Usa Ying I would first like to mention that it was a pleasure meeting you at the USEPA oflSce on Friday, Director EmarW May 31. As you may recall, although the meeting was called for the individual apartment clean- Louis DeSrtvio Ciwtes Gaines up program under development by the EPA, I was concerned that the interior of the buildings Joseph Lolteo were being cleaned while the exterior facades were not. We at Southbridge (SBT) were notified by your office that only one out of ten buildings was scheduled for ficad© cleaning. To add insult to injury, that building is the only non-residential building we have which is occupied by Foot Locker and Burger King. I did ask if SBT would be able to obtain the test results prefornKd by the Board of Health on our buildings that led to the determination of only the one commercial building qualifying. I would much appreciate if you would provide me with the copies of the test results or a contact that may be able to provide the information.

Also, the license agreement includes a reimbursement provision if compensation is received by the building. In light of the feet that SBT is currently in dispute with our insurer with respect to the fecade cleaning, and that no deadline for acceptance of the license agreement was established, I respectfully request time to have our counsel review the agreement and to be able to make a decision only after our insurance claim is resolved.

In the meantime, I am attaching a copy of a letter sent to Mr. Rradhakrishnan, PE on behalf of SBT for your reference. As you will see, our concern is that all our residential buildings were subjected to the same amount of dust as the one commercial buidling.

Looking forward to hearing from you. Your courtesy and attention is much appreciated.

Toni D’Egidio General Manager

Enclosure

c: Board of Directors wZout enclosures Esra N. Goodman, Esq. w/ enclosures

NYC-WTC_000154783

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000154783Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →