NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 52/80 GOLD STREET Block: 94 Lot: 1 BIN: 1083349 100 BEEKMAN STREET, BUILDING #6
Document / 4 pages

Asbestos inspection report, 90 Gold Street, July 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Asbestos inspection report for the roof and facade of 90 Gold Street conducted on July 18, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000128177–000128180

Folder label: “80 GOLD STREET Block: 94 Lot: 1 BIN: 1083349 100 BEEKMAN STREET, BUILDING #6

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000128180
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

r

• a

4

S&uthbridga Towers, 1nc. 90Beekman Street New York New York 10038 * Tel(212)267-6190*Fax

Rc 1" June 10, 2002 Jody Watson Robb, Wambay Mr. Robert C. Avaltroni John Fats New York City Department of Environmental Protection w 59-17 Junction Boulevard, 11* floor Corona, New York 11368 :1171[ Re: Southbridge Towers, Inc/80 Gold StJ 55-Fulton St/ Foot Locker John ost CarloPaco ari Mo Perrone Logy SWiive n Dear Mr. Avaltoni: Louis Trazino uea Ybg I would first like to mention that it was a pleasure meeting you at the USEPA office on Friday, Director Emeriti May 31. As you may recall, although the meeting was called for the individual apartment clean- Loads Desaw Charles cairn up program under development by the EPA, I was concerned that the interior of the buildings were being cleaned while the exterior facades were not. We at Southbridge (SBT) were notified by your office that only one out often buildings was scheduled for facade cleaning. To add insult to injury, that building is the only non-residential building we have which is occupied by Foot Locker and Burger King. I did ask if SBT would be able to obtain the test results preformed by the Board of Health on our buildings that led to the determination of only the one commercial building qualifying. I would much appreciate if you would provide me with the copies of the test results or a contact that may be able to provide the information.

Also, the license agreement includes a reimbursement provision if compensation is received by the building. In light of the fact that SBT is currently in dispute with our insurer with respect to the facade cleaning, and that no deadline for acceptance of the license agreement was established, I respectfully request time to have our counsel review the agreement and to be able to make a decision only after our insurance claim is resolved.

In the meantime, I am attaching a copy of a letter sent to Mr. Rradhakrishnan, PE on behalf of SBT for your reference. As you will see, our concern is that all our residential buildings were subjected to the same amount of dust as the one commercial buidling.

Looking forward to hearing from you. Your courtesy and attention is much appreciated.

Sincerely ' L

Toni D'Egidio General Manager

Enclosure

c: Board of Directors w/out enclosures Esra N. Goodman, Esq. w/ enclosures

NYC-WTC 000128180

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000128180Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →