NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 12/GCMS X 2/1/02 A 2/5/02
Document / 164 pages

GCMS DFTPP calibration report, Feb 5 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Chromatogram and method report for DFTPP calibration verification conducted on February 5, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000004770–000004933

Folder label: “GCMS X 2/1/02 A 2/5/02”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000004891
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Library Search Compound Report Data File : C:\MSDCHEM\1\5973N\02FEB05\29232A.D Vial: 4 Acq On 5 Feb 2002 1:13 pm Operator: Sample : 508 scan; re-ext Inst : Instrumen Mise : February 5, 2002 Multiplr: 1.00 MS Integration Params: LSCINT.P Quant Method : C:\MSDCHEM\l-..\SCAN508.M (RTE Integrator) Title : 508 scan method Library : C:\DATABASE\WILEY7N.L ********************************************************************* Peak Number 10 Uracil, 5-ethyl- $$ 2,4(1H,... Concentration Rank 13 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 13.37 0.05 ug/L 48532 Naphthalene-d8 13.20 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual

1 Uracil, 5-ethyl- $$ 2,4(1H,3H)-P... 140 C6H8N202 004212-49-1 64 1® 2 Thieno[3,2-b]thiophene $$ 1,4-Di... 140 C6H4S2 000251-41-2 64 (ob 3 Phenol, 4-(methylthio)- (CAS) $$... 140 C7H80S 001073-72-9 64e c 4 Pyrazine, 2-methyl-3-(methylthio... 140 C6H8N2S 002882-20-4 59 " Abundance Scan 876 (13.375 min): 29232A.D (-) m/z 140.10 100.00% 140 ft 5000

70 96 ...... n...... , 13.00 13.20 13.40 13.60 13.80 42 52 I 84 ll 112 ।

m/z-> 0- II 40 50 T ■ ■ ! . . I ■ [ . . . ■ । , I ■ . ! . -471 60 70 80 90 100 0 110 120 130 140 ■ ■ i ■ m/z96.10 14.23% Abundance #35153: Uracil, 5-ethyl- $$ 2,4(1 H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 5-... 14.0 125 82 5000 13.00 13.20 13.40 13.60 13.80 54 m/ z 94.10 11.82% 68 96 1 0- | 111 1'1 । I 1 1 I■ ■ I 1 1 1 1 l'i > 1 1 I > > +T +1 • ■ i ' m/z-> 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Abundance #35132: Thieno[3,2-b]thiophene $$ 1,4-Dithiapentalene $$ 1... 140 e 13.00 13.20 13.40 13.60 13.80 5000 m/z 141.00 11.60% 96 45 69 0- , II, 82 88 — ' ' i ' ' ' ■ i ■ ■ 1 1 i ' ' I ' ' ' ' I 1 ‘ ‘ I ' ' ' ' I 1 ' n/z-> 40 50 60I 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Abundance #35283: Phenol, 4-(methylthio)- (CAS) $$ 4-(Methylthio)phe... ■ i ' ' ■ ■ i 1 ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ‘ i ' 140 13.00 13.20 13.40 13.60 13.80 125 m/z70.00 11.42%

5000

97

/z—> 0 . ,1,, 40 50 60 70 80 85

90 ,| , |l|l| 100 107 .i.i,,,., 110 120 - 130 -l 140 )) .0, 13.00 13.20 13.40 13.60 13.80

29232A.D SCAN508.M Fri Feb 22 11:44:19 2002 Page 12

NYC-WTC_000004891

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000004891Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000003981

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.998

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000004494

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.998

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000004935

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.998

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →