NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000234660

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000234660
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000234660
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

PS 150 M - 334 GREENWICH STREET SUMMARY LEAD-IN-DUST-WIPE SAMPLE Date # of Sample Lead Concentration (pg/ft") 11/29/01 60 Laboratory analysis indicated that one (1) dust wipe collected on the floor area (+ 4 blanks) contained >40 ng/ft" of lead from the following location: • 2"^ floor girl’s toilet = 103.2 ug/ft^

Laboratory analysis indicated that five (5) dust wipe collected on the window wells contained >250 ug/ft^ of lead from the following locations: • Rooms 501 (2"'* window) = 521.2 ug/ft* • 502 (2"‘‘ window) = 1274.7 ug/tf • 403 (4“’ window) = 947 ug/ft^ • 3 floor corridor (6* window) = 1627.8 ug/ft^ ■ r‘ floor foyer (5* window^) = 1570.4 ug/ft^

Lead concentration in the blanks were below the detection limit.______________ 11/30/01 59 Laboratory analysis indicated that one (1) dust wipe collected on tlie window well ( + 6 blanks) contained >250 ug/f? of lead from the following location: (after cleanup) • Cafeteria window sill = 456.2 ug/ft^

Lead concentration in all other dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blanks were below the detection limit._____________ 12/01/01 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit_______________ 01/21/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit 01/29/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit_______________ 02/04/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in tlie blank was below the detection limit_______________ 02/05/02 7 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in tlie blank was below the detection limit_______________ 02/11/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit_______________ 02/18/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit_______________ 02/25/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit._______________ 03/04/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit._______________ 03/11/02 4 Lead concentration in all dust wipe samples collected was less than all applicable (+1 Blank) standards for lead in dust on floor and windowsills. Lead concentration in the blank was below the detection limit.

CITY_21MC100_003291889

NYC-WTC_000234660

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000234660Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →