NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 80 pages

NYC-WTC_000233682

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000233682–000233761
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000233707
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

2.8 Water Quality/Consumer Complaint Report Form

INSTRUCTIONS This form is provided to guide the individual responsible for evaluating unusual water quality data or consumer complaints. It is designed to prompt the analyst to consider various factors or information when evaluating the unusual data. The actual data used in this analysis should be compiled separately and appended to this form. The form can be used to support the threat evaluation due to a threat warning from unusual water quality or consumer complaints, or another type of threat warning in which water quality data or consumer complaints are used to support the evaluation.

Note that in this form, water quaiity refers to both specific water quality parameters and the general aesthetic characteristics of the water that might result in consumer complaints.

Threat warning is based on: □ Water quality □ Consumer complaints □ Other

What is the water quality parameter or complaint under consideration?

Are unusual consumer complaints corroborated by unusual water quality data?

Is the unusual water quality indicative of a particular contaminant of concern? For example, is the color, order, or taste associated with a particular contaminant?

Are consumers in the affected area experiencing any unusual health symptoms?

What is ‘typical’ for consumer complaints for the current season and water quality? Number of compiaints. Nature of compiaints. Ciustering of compiaints

What is considered to be ‘normal’ water quality (i.e., what is the baseline water quality data or level of consumer complaints)?

What is reliability of the method or instrumentation used for the water quality analysis? Are standards and reagents OK? is the method/instrument functioning properiy?

Based on recent data, does the unusual water quality appear to be part of a gradual trend (i.e., occurring over several days or longer)?

Are the unusual water quality observations sporadic over a wide area, or are they clustered in a particular area? What is the extent of the area? A pressure zone. A neighborhood. A city biock. A street. A buiiding.

25 Interim Final - August 2004

CITY_21MC100_004992364

NYC-WTC_000233707

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000233707Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000165900 · Box 7DDC

Document page containing contact details for Con Edison and JWC Environmental Health & Safety personnel.

Similar indexed content

NYC-WTC_000149798 · Box DEP Box 10

Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.

Similar indexed content

Compare copies and versions →