NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000231618

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000231618
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000231618
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

One University Place Institute for Health and the Environment Room B242 Department of Environrnental Health & Toxicology Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA School of Public Health 4 joint venture with the New York State Department ofHealth In affiliation with Albany Medical College Of Phone:(518)525-2660 Fax: (518) 525-2665 [email protected]

University at Albany STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK January 3, 2003

Joel R. Kupferman New York Environmental Law & Justice Project 351 Broadway, #400 New York, NY 10013-3902

Dear Mr. Kupferman;

Thank you for the information on the lead and asbestos testing of balconies at Southbridge Towers.

Balconies pose an important problem because there are, in fact, extensions of internal living space, although they are obviously subject to contamination from outside sources. In my view, one should apply the same clean-up standards to balconies as to indoor living areas. For lead, the EPA/HUD hazard levels are 40 pg/ft^ on floors and 250 pg/ft^ on sills.

All of the balcony samples which I have seen reported exceed these values. I conclude the lead in the dust on balconies poses a significant health problem, and that these balconies should be cleaned. If there are high levels of lead on the balconies, one must assume that there are also high levels on the walls of the buildings. Furthermore, considering the fact that many surrounding buildings’ exteriors were cleaned, I also conclude that Southbridge’s exterior should be cleaned. Since the balconies are so close to the exterior walls, one could assume that the exteriors are tainted with lead and asbestos.

The asbestos results which I have seen are more complicated to interpret, since asbestos levels are usually presented as fibers per unit area. These results show asbestos as percentage of total dust weight. Three of four balcony samples show no detectable asbestos by quantitative analysis, while all samples show fi-om a trace to less than 1% by TEM analysis. This higher value corresponds to the levels reported by Lioy et al. (Environ. Health Perspect. 108:708, 2002) for dust obtained from three sites near the WTC in mid September. It is hard to estimate the public health hazard without knowledge of the areas which were sampled. However, asbestos should not be found on balconies and further testing should be done. I hope these comments will be of use. Best regards.

Sincerely,

David O. Carpenter, ] Professor & Director

DOC/dar Visit our website at www.albany.edu/ihe

CITY_21MC100_008882451

NYC-WTC_000231618

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000231618Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →