NYC-WTC_000199809

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

[ Jessica L'eighton - RE: Quick asbestos question Page I

From: "Wilder, Lynn" <[email protected]> To: "'Robert Johnson'" <[email protected]>, "DePasquale, Annmarie" <[email protected]>, '"Nancy Jeffery'" <[email protected]> Date: 4/26/02 3:36PM Subject: RE: Quick asbestos question

Annmarie and Nancy,

I scanned the settled dust sample results for asb. And only found Bldgs 10 (70 battery place) and 11 (66 Frankfort) to have levels indoors > 1% The rest of the >1% were outdoors. For both of these, PLM analysis showed ND for asbestos, TEM analysis showed 1.5%. I couldn't find the bldg referred to (90 Gold St) in our files. Perhaps it's not ATSDR/PHS sampling? All indoor sampling that we did was using the HEPA vac (technically, different that microvac). All outdoor settled dust sampling was done by gently scraping visible settled dust into a sample bag.

If this doesn't help, call me!! (404) 498-0461

Lynn

---- Original Message----- From; Robert Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:55 PM To; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Quick asbestos question

Hello Lynn-

Thanks so much contacting Sven so quickly and getting that information up here to us for the reporter. Nancy, etc. are very grateful for the quick response.

Nancy had one question (not for the reporter) that she thought that you might have the answer to. Please see the two attachments. (Issue: Bulk or micovac indoor air sample??)

Forgive me for consuming your entire day with all these questions. (1 feel like I definitely owe you and Sue N some homemade cookies when I get back in town after all these questions).

I am about to look at the letter report for WTC with Nancy and we'll give you a call later this afternoon. What time will you be in the office until today?

Thanks again. Annmarie

CC: "Rodenbeck, Sven" <[email protected]>

CITY_21MC1OO_OO3O36373

NYC-WTC_000199809