NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

PCM fiber results lab report, Aug 1998

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory report documenting PCM fiber analysis results for air samples collected on August 11, 1998.

NYC-WTC_000186288–000186289
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000186289
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

<

SciLabJob#: 98-08-5975; r f Client Name: Applied Technology Services. Inc. ' ' Elias£_£flnti2sL_2^Si£EfiS£2BX-IECM)_Eih£E_Sesults A98113; Third Floor Finals Flow Air Fiber Fibers SciLab Client Dale Rate Duration Filtered Fields Fibers Density Cone. TWA Sample # Sample # / Location Collected (liters/min.) (min.) (liters) (Fibers/mm" ) (Fifaers/cc)

11 34081198-45 8/11/98 0 0 0 100 0.5 0.64 Held Blank Footnotes: /

12 34081198-46 8/11/98 0 0 0 100 0.5 0.64 Held Blank Footnotes: I Reporting Notes: (1) Fibers/cc cannot be calculatod<ft^antl^(or^Iafikh with no air volume. Analyzed by: Marvin Brothers^'U Tt* ----- Date Analyzed: 8/11/98 Samples analyzed by NIOSH 7400(A) MEtntSo, Issue #2, 8/15/94; Limit of Detection = 5.5 fibers per 100 fields or 7 fibers / mm2: This report relates ONLY to the sample analysis expressed as fibers/sq mm of filter area; ND = no fibers observed; NA = Not Analyzed; Walton - Beckett gradicule field area 0.00785 mm2; Duration in minutes; TWA = 8Hr TWA calculation assumes zero exposure for remainder of 8 hour period not sampled; Upper 95% Confidence Limit (Employer's Compliance Test) - Calculated as a one sided UCL to determine 95% certainty of compliance with the 0.01 fiber/cc standard; Estimated relative standard deviation: Intralab Sr = 0.270, Interlab Sr = 0.450. ELAP #11480

o H

NJ

S o o o I o o co

o o Cn

NYC-WTC_000186289

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000186289Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →