NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

Site sign-in sheet and work progress report, Nov 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Daily log sheet recording company personnel sign-ins and safety observations regarding debris removal operations at the World Trade Center site in November 2001.

NYC-WTC_000182379–000182380
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000182379
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

rf- 2

Shift Overlap Meeting Minutes DATE: November I?, 2001

SHIFT GOE^G OFF: 3:00 pm -11:00 pm SHIFT GOING ON: 11:00 pm-7:00 am

Meeting Attendants: (See attached sign in sheet)

Companies/Organizations Represented: 1. Amec 2. ATC 3. Bovis 4. DDC 5. Liberty Mutual 6. Tulley

Sector Reports: AMEC SECTOR

Work in Progress: • Removing steel and debris from WTC 1; • Removal of demolition debris from WTC 6; • Removal of debris slide from WTCl on SW comer of WTC6;

Safety Observations: • Angel Airial not tieing off while on top of water truck; • Angel Airial using 6’ lanyards while on truck, should be using shorter lanyards; • Man baskets need overhead protection; • Crane on ramp to WTC 6 will be replaced by a wider crane, thereby requiring fall protection to be removed. New crane will be wide enough to preclude personnel access to the crane pad thereby eliminating fall hazard;

BOVIS SECTOR Work in Progress: • Debris removal at WTC 2;

Safety Observations: • Bovis concerned that Liberty Mutual tickets indicate safety violations in the Bovis zone that may not be the responsibility of Bovis. Tully is responsible for the correct installation of the personal fall arrest system currently installed along the

CITY_21MC100_003578757

NYC-WTC_000182379

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000182379Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →