NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 44/P.A WTC C-81, DEY St. Replacement Sewer (WTC-DEY ST UNDERPASS)
Document / 5 pages

DEP comments on WTC Dey St manhole load, March 1982

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

March 15, 1982 DEP letter providing engineering requirements for a telephone manhole load above the proposed 13-inch sewer line.

NYC-WTC_000165536–000165540

Folder label: “P.A WTC C-81, DEY St. Replacement Sewer (WTC-DEY ST UNDERPASS)

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000165539
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

THE o-- nr'’" Trs N.Y T-'S . 4r-,.7oc- (201) 622-000'

January 29, 1982

Mr. Frederick Novotny, P.E. Chief, Division of Sewer Regulation & Control City of New York Department of iflnviromental Protection 2358 Municipal Building C 3 IOC-, New York, New York 10007

Re: THE WORLD TRADE CENTERi-, Dey Street Underpass

Dear Mr. Novotny;

All the revisions you-drequested in your October 8, 1981 letter to me have been incorporated into l^lity Agreement Drawing Nos. WTC-Cl through WTC-C7-81, except as follows.

Generally, specific d'eteails of sewer manholes, cradles, casings and subsoil conditions as well as sjBnilar elements of construction for participating utility companies have been omitied since the above drawings are only required to establish the lanes for eachedf-the relocated utilities. Upon receipt of your approval, we will complete detailed Contract Drawings and submit them to you for approval. Note #1 of tHe'General Notes on Drawing No. WTC-C3-81 con­ firms this procedure.

I understand that wherSii^er Con Edison 'Steam lines affect the sewer system they also will submit Conslwract Drawings for your review and approval.

The following are speoifrc references to the comments in your October 8th letter using the saraenhitem numbers.

1. Drawing No. C-4 has begii revised to show 4'-2" clear between the building and the steampi^pe casing. Class 56 ductile iron pipe on a Class "35" concrete (Siradle. Additional detail as noted alsove will be included in thejrfinal Contract Drawings.

2. A complete profile of jlth.e rerouted 18" sewer is provided on a new drawing, WTC-C7-81.

3. As you suggested, we attfeempted to redesign Manhole #3 as an "L"- shaped manhole but concaluded that adjacent construction rendered that method impracticakr We therefore returned to the original design with entrance t.certhe sewer at the existing manhole. In a previous submission, you did not object to this method.

• N - J

Vw'riter's direct dial telephone: ~

NYC-WTC_000165539

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000165539Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

DEP letter re WTC river intake plans, May 1982 · Box DEP Box 44

NYC-WTC_000165078

Department of Environmental Protection letter dated May 28, 1982, providing comments on submitted plans for relocating river water intake lines at the World Trade Center.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.962

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
DEP letter re WTC river intake plans, Oct 1982 · Box DEP Box 44

NYC-WTC_000165098

Department of Environmental Protection letter dated October 25, 1982, providing comments on revised plans for relocating river water intake lines at the World Trade Center.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.959

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

No available related records indexed in this group.

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →