NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 3 pages

90 Gold Street inspection follow-up memo, April 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Memo detailing failed attempts to access apartment 19B at 90 Gold Street for sampling and noting tenant re-occupancy.

NYC-WTC_000163745–000163747

Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000163745
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Radhakrishnan, Krish [DEPNET1/DEPGPO2/KrishR] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:59 PM To: Gilsenan, Michael Subject: FW: 90 Gold Street

FYI

—Original Message From: Lutchmedial, CarisUen Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:16 AM To: Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: 90 Gold Street On Friday April 12, 2002 (9:30 am), I again followed up for the inspection at 90 Gold street. I met with the building Superintendent Anthony Medina. He informed me that the telephone number for the tenant at 19B has been disconnected. The notice 1 had left along with a business card was still at the same location on the door.

Saturday April 13, 2002 (10 am) I visited the apartment again and rang the bell again. There was no response. The card and notice was still on the door.

PS according to the superintendent Tony, this apartment was re-occupied since the sampling by a new tenant. As a result, it was completed cleaned and re-painted.

Robert Knowles of the ATSDR said that the sample taken was a micro vacuum sample.

1

NYC-WTC_000163745

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000163745Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →