NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 8 pages

E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000162258–000162265
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162260
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Page 2 of 7

“We are pleased that the EPA has decided to accept responsibility for protection of residents of Lower Manhattan,” said Joel Shufro, executive director of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH), a coalition of unions and health professionals. “This is not only a step in the right direction, it is a reversal of EPA's policy.”

“However, it is a shame that these measures were not taken at a time when they could have prevented the heavy exposure to the toxic dust that covered Lower Manhattan. For nearly 8 months the EPA has denied that it has authority to protect people from exposure to toxic substances indoors,” said Shufro. “Now the EPA is taking responsibility for protecting Lower Manhattan residents - an action which it could have taken months ago.”

During the 34 weeks that have passed since the attack on the World Trade Center, workers, residents and students in Lower Manhattan have been exposed to dust that is contaminated with asbestos, fiberglass, lead, highly alkaline concrete dust, and many other toxic substances.

“The EPA should accept that responsibility, and announce a plan to clean up all indoor spaces, including workplaces and schools, of all WTC-related contamination,” said Shufro.

In addition to its lack of coverage for workplaces and schools and its lack of any mention of contaminants other than asbestos, the plan has many other major shortcomings.

The EPA plan lacks any provision for oversight from outside the same government agencies that have shirked their responsibility for all this time. ‘We believe the plan must include the appointment of an independent advisory committee, including representatives of tenants, workers, students and elected officials, with the authority to intervene if government agencies are not acting to protect public health,” Shufro said.

The EPA plan lacks any protocols for testing, cleanup and post-cleanup clearance. Such protocols must be produced and published.

The EPA plan would permit individuals to clean up asbestos contaminated dust by themselves, with EPA advice. For an untrained person to attempt such a cleanup is inappropriate - possibly creating a health hazard not only for themselves, but also for their neighbors.

It should not be the responsibility of individual tenants to request, or not request, testing and clean ups. Testing and appropriate clean-up of all effected indoor spaces should be the responsibility of the government.

The EPA plan lacks any provision for creating a health registry and for medical surveillance of people exposed to toxic substances in Lower Manhattan. A health registry and medical surveillance are absolutely essential.

Most Cars Caught in WTC Collapse Will Be Destroyed, but Others Face Uncertain Fate

Hundreds of cars and trucks that were contaminated with asbestos-laden dust from the World Trade Center collapse are at the center of a controversy that has pitted government officials, unions, insurance companies and public health advocates against each other.

3/7/2003

NYC-WTC_000162260

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162260Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →