NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 31/66 JOHN 59 MAIDEN LANE
Document / 19 pages

66 JOHN 59 MAIDEN LANE

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000156126–000156144
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000156128
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Region 2 New Jersey. New York. Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands 290 Broadway - New York. New York 10007-1666 www.epa.8ov/refllon2

Contact: Mary Mears 212-637-3669

EPA RELEASES STUDY THAT SHOWS RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR CLEANING WORLD TRADE CENTER DUST WORK

' FOR RELEASE: Wednesday, June 4,2003

(#03064) New York, New York - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released the results of a study confirming that cleaning methods used by residents and professionals in lower Manhattan in the aftermath ofthe World Trade Crater collapse are effective. In its Confirmation Cleaning Study, the Agency tested a variety of cleaning methods in a heavily impacted building near Ground Zero. The Agency also released its study of levels ofpollution in homes not impacted by the collapse. Both studies were funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and conducted in cooperation with New York City.

EPA conducted its Confirmation Cleaning Study to determine the adequacy of various methods that were used by residents and professional cleaning companies to clean World Trade Center (WTC) dust in residential spaces in lower Manhattan. For its study, EPA used a five-story, mixed use building containing thirteen apartments and five commercial spaces located at 110 Liberty Street. The.apartments and businesses in this building had varjdng amounts of dust and debris present after the World Trade Center collapse. EPA tested the effectiveness of several different cleaning techniques, including using high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtered vacuums, mops and wet cloths. In addition, the Agency cleaned carpets and cleaned air ducts using standard methods. Before and after cleaning, EPA tested for lead, dioxin, polycyclic a’-Qjnatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), man-made vitreous fibers (fibrous glass) and crystalline silica and tested the air for asbestos. The study found that the cleaning methods all reduced concentrations of WTC-related contaminants to levels below health-based benchmarks. In some cases, repeated cleaning was necessary. The results are reassuring and show that residents who followed the recommendations arc likely to have effectively eliminated the potential threat posed by residual WTC dust The Agency recommends that any residrat who may have lingering concerns about dust in their homes clean several times using methods EPA has recommended since September 2001, which include wet wiping and mopping, and the use ofa HEPA vacuum. These methods will allow residents to be certain that they have removed as much ofthe dust as possible.

EPA also conducted a Background Study to detennine indoor concentrations of contaminants ofpotential concern in areas of New York City that were not physically impacted by the dust or debris from the WTC collapse. The data collected from this study are consistent with other studies and background data.

For full reports of these studies or for more information on EPA’s Indoor Air Residential Assistance Program, visit the Agency’s Web site at wwwxpa?gov/wtc. ------

# # #

t: IE: 42 U.S. =PP - Reston 2 53X p.ei

N YC-WTC_000156128

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000156128Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →