NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 6 pages

Building and contamination inventory scope forwarded, May 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

Forwarded DOITT/PlanGraphics scope of work for building and contamination inventory database development and implementation.

NYC-WTC_000162173–000162178

Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162173
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Chapin, Diana Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:18 PM To: Ward, Chris; Avaltroni, Robert; Gilsenan, Michael (ex); Sturcken, Charles Subject: FW: Building and Parks Data Inventory

■j DOITT scope 051302.doc

---- Original Message---- From: Jim Miller [mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:05 AM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]; [email protected]; Maddaloni.MarkSepamail.epa.gov; [email protected]; Jessica Leighton; Jeanine Prudhomme; Kelly McKinney; Nancy Jeffery; Roger Hayes; Reena Mahajan; Vincent Coluccio; Wilfredo Lopez; [email protected] ; 1yee @ oera.nyc.gov Subject: Building and Parks Data Inventory

Jim—thanks for pulling this document together. Everyone else—The attached outlines DOITT/PlanGraphics' scope of work for the Building and Parks Data Inventory. You may want to read the attachment before reading my comments.

Two comments. I foresee that the NYC Law Department will be another system user. The Law Department will want full access to the database, including apartment-specific information.

The proposal contemplates the addition of 2 substances (beyond asbestos) to the database (p. 2, 1st full bullet). As the EPA is currently working with a list of 7 specific substances (asbestos, fibrous glass, refractile ceramic fibers, silica, dioxins, PAHs, and lead), plus total dust, the database should be developed to accomodate these 8 items. In addition, test results for other substances may be available, and the database should have a section for these other substances.

Does this proposal include data entry? While a large portion of test information may be import-able in an electronic format, some test results may exist only in hard copy and thus need data entry. Cleaning information about various locations will also need to entered.

I am copying DEP, EPA, Law, and MOEC on this reply. Let's include an update on this project for the Bldgs and Parks cmte meeting: 11 am on Weds 5/15 at MOEC.

»> "Jim Hall" <[email protected]> 05/13/02 10:05AM »> Jim & Sam - I made some changes to the previous version based on feedback from Sam.

Jim - Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thanks, Jim

---- Original Message----- From: Jim Miller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:57 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: DOITT funding for WTC

1

NYC-WTC_000162173

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162173Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

EPA/FEMA interagency agreement proposal, July 2002 · Box DEP Box 43

NYC-WTC_000163893

EPA proposes interagency agreement to FEMA regarding WTC asbestos, metals, and dioxin monitoring and validation with updated cost estimates for cleanup and monitoring activities.

7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.934

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →