NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 42/E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002
Document / 5 pages

Residential site theft and human remains report, June 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Report summarizing findings on theft allegations at a residential site and discovery of human remains nearby.

NYC-WTC_000161162–000161166

Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000161166
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

AvaltronI, Robert Illi WB From: Erdferb, Stuart Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:27 PM To: Avaltroni, Robert Subject: FW: Lower Manhattan Communications Consultant Selection

FYI

—original Message— From: Erdfarb, Stuart On Behalf Of Erdfarb, Stuart Sent: Thursday, June 06,20021:01 PM to: M^rd, Chris Subject: FW: Lower Manhattan Communications consultant selection

I spoke with Laura Blatchford. The procurement process used by EDC mirrors that used by DEC and EPA, but not by the City. It appears that all the right steps were taken and I see no reason not to confirm the EDC selection. Laura tells me, however, that the selection committee has not yet finalized its choice and is still looking at the two finalists. She mentioned that the contract may have to go through DEP in order to get the FEMA reimbursement. I told her that I did not know how that could be done. She asked for someone to speak to so I gave her Jeff Weinstein's telephone number at the Mayor's Office of Contracts. I did advise her, however, that calling him may open a Pandora's box and that she should tread carefully.

—original Message— Prom: Erdfarb, Stuart On Behalf Of Erdfarb, Stuart Sent: Tuesday, June 04,200212;41 pm to: ’[email protected]’ Cc ward, Chris Subject: Lower Manhattan Communications Consultant selection

1 am the Agency Chief Contracting Officer at DEP and Commissioner Chris Ward asked that I review the process that was used by EDC to procure the Consultant for the Lower Manhattan Communications project. I have a few questions.

How was it decided that the committee (made up of the Deputy Mayor for Eco Devel & Bldg Office and EDC reps) would evaluate the top 23 firms as ranked by the EDC committee? Why 23? Subsequently, the top 7 were selected? If the top 7 were selected, what is the significance of the 23? Why was there an intermediate step?

When the final 2 firms were considered, were they re-scored and re-ranked based upon the presentations made at City Hall? If not, how was the selection of the BEST made?

Was cost considered at all? If not, how will cost be arrived at?

Thanks very much. Stuart M. Er^arb 718-595-3300

NYC-WTC_000161166

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000161166Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →