6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗DEP memo on REBNY meeting scheduling and project details, April
Machine-extracted title · confidence 92%Correspondence confirming a meeting with REBNY representatives and noting that project details are the primary focus over release forms.
NYC-WTC_000160824–000160829Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document a'
Avalt+ronl,Rthert. . From: Gilsenan, Michael Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:34 PM To: Radhakrishnan, Krish Cc: Avaltroni, Robert Subject: FW: DOH Referral from hotline
Krish pis. take a look at the following and let me get your comments.
—Original Message----- From: Jeanine Prudhomme [mallto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:59 PM To: Caroline Bragdon; Christopher D'Andrea; Jim Miller; Kelly McKinney; Nancy Jeffery; Roger Hayes; Vincent Colucclo; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: DOH Referral from hotline
With respect to Vince's comment, the analytical method may not have differentiated "other" airborne fibers from asbestos fibers (the PCM-TEM issue). That's also a high number if It is an air sample! Ther must be a missed decimal point. Can DEP check whether or not her building owner has provided data on testing and cleaning of common areas? If not, could DEP visit the building?
We have not issued any advisories requiring that carpets are removed and replaced, I have stated in the past that only those items which cannot be cleaned in a satisfactory manner be discarded as municipal solid waste. In this case, "satisfactory" means by knowledge of extent of original contamination and visual observation of the effectiveness of the cleaning method - i.e. if it looks clean, it is clean. We did not issue blanket advisories that carpets needed to be discarded or that they needed to be tested. We should be cognizant of where the EPA and Lower Manhattan Task Force cleaning groups are going with respect to cleaning and clearance of carpets since it Is documented that it is difficult to remove fibers from carpets. We need to keep this in mind as it appears that the COC group's recommendation for asbestos in settled dust will be the ASTM microvac sample method - we will need to verify whether or not the group intends to sample carpets with this method. We also need to ensure that the criteria we are looking into will apply to carpets as well (and all of the other issues such as background, when to dispose of if cleaning is not effective, etc.)
Jim: I think that someone from the DOH needs to closely participate in these cleaning sub groups - I assume that you or someone else is. Let me know if you need any assistance from me.
One of us could also call her to clarify her results and determine the method of cleaning, and get other information. Maybe we should put her on the list of potential locations for sampling as Nancy suggested.
Jeanine Prud'homme Assistant Commissioner Office of Environmental Sciences & Engineering Ph: (212) 295-5386 Fax: (212) 295-5428
NYC-WTC 000160824
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000160683
Transmission of WTC-related Q and A document to interagency task force with EPA Regional contact information.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160798
Correspondence regarding finalizing release forms and letters required before DEP meetings with building owners to commence exterior work in early April 2002.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160730
Memo summarizing DEP's response to WTC hotline referrals, noting resolved cases and inspection results regarding visible debris.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160754
DEP discussion of whether Compliance office should schedule WTC meetings or await Law Department legal review of outstanding issues.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160772
Discussion of contractors performing WTC facade cleanup using wet-soaking and power-washing protocols and potential water use restriction exemptions.
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160748
Correspondence discussing the scheduling of meetings with building owners and the need for legal vetting of compliance issues.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160740
Correspondence between EPA and DEP officials discussing scheduling meetings with building owners to address exterior cleanup issues in late March 2002.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000161964
Notice to NYC business community regarding procedures for reopening buildings south of 14th Street following 9/11.
3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160788
DEP discussion of drafting water use exemption notice for contractors performing necessary WTC hazard remediation and facade cleanup work.
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151581
EPA, FEMA, and NYC DEP staff correspondence discussing a draft letter regarding indoor air issues and funding support for World Trade Center-related environmental work.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160778
Correspondence between DEP staff discussing exterior cleaning scope, vehicle standards, and coordination with legal counsel in late March 2002.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000147703
DOH and DEP staff review air sample analytical results and discuss asbestos fiber detection methodology and building cleaning protocols.
Similarity score 0.996 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138458
DOH review of air sample analytical methods regarding asbestos fiber differentiation and carpet cleaning/disposal guidance for post-9/11 contamination.
Similarity score 0.994 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000163621
Technical analysis of asbestos fiber test results and discussion of cleaning versus replacement standards for contaminated building materials.
Similarity score 0.994 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139641
DEP memo forwarding DOH referral regarding potentially anomalous air sample results and questions about building owner compliance with cleaning.
Similarity score 0.993 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.963 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Buildings in this record
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
- 400 Chambers Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.85 · verify page 3
Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder