6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗DEP memo on REBNY meeting scheduling and project details, April
Machine-extracted title · confidence 92%Correspondence confirming a meeting with REBNY representatives and noting that project details are the primary focus over release forms.
NYC-WTC_000160824–000160829Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Cell: (917) 807-2583 e-mail: [email protected]
>>> Nancy Jeffery 04/02/02 10:57AM >>> So, what do you suggest a response would be to the caller regarding the "letter" should be?
I suggest that we discuss this with FEMA.
Nancy Loder Jeffery Director Environmental and Occupational Disease Epidemiology (212) 788-4290
>>> Vincent Coluccio 04/02/02 09:46AM >>> Jim
Routine HEPA vacuuming is certainly appropriate here.
There is no standard definition of professional cleaning, and it begs the question as to what the cleaning company did. For example, did they remove rugs and matting, HEPA vac and steam clean them and clean the floor before replacing them? This might be a best case cleaning scenario. On the other hand, did they just pass a (non-HEPA) vacuum over the rugs? These types of questions may become more prevalent as tenants begin to reflect on actions taken in their apartments by cleaning services during the immediate aftermath of 9/11.
Two side points - She is requesting bulk dust testing, however if she is HEPA vacuuming every day there shouldn't be enough dust available in her apartment for a bulk sample. Also, the asbestos fiber value for the rug is presented as 42 fibers/cc, which is an airborne concentration and not a loading value.
Vin
>>> Jim Miller 04/01/02 08:09PM >>> Vin—Does HEPA vacuuming seem appropriate for these conditions? Is there a standard definition re what constitutes "professional cleaning"?
Mike—Does her concern for dusty common areas warrant a referral to DEP for a site visit?
>>> WTC Hotline <[email protected]> 04/01/02.12:12PM_>>>, PII 1. I spoke at length this morning with a woman named._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._., She lives at 400 Chambers St., apt; PII; She has 2 young children and is concerned about their health. She re-occupied her apt in October but didn't test her apt until February. In Feb, she hired Pure Solutions to test the dust/air for $1500, they found asbestos fibers in her rug (42 fibers/cc) she obtained a HEPA Vac and has been cleaning every day. She also had her apt
NYC-WTC 000160826
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000160683
Transmission of WTC-related Q and A document to interagency task force with EPA Regional contact information.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160798
Correspondence regarding finalizing release forms and letters required before DEP meetings with building owners to commence exterior work in early April 2002.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160730
Memo summarizing DEP's response to WTC hotline referrals, noting resolved cases and inspection results regarding visible debris.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160754
DEP discussion of whether Compliance office should schedule WTC meetings or await Law Department legal review of outstanding issues.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160772
Discussion of contractors performing WTC facade cleanup using wet-soaking and power-washing protocols and potential water use restriction exemptions.
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160748
Correspondence discussing the scheduling of meetings with building owners and the need for legal vetting of compliance issues.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160740
Correspondence between EPA and DEP officials discussing scheduling meetings with building owners to address exterior cleanup issues in late March 2002.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000161964
Notice to NYC business community regarding procedures for reopening buildings south of 14th Street following 9/11.
3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160788
DEP discussion of drafting water use exemption notice for contractors performing necessary WTC hazard remediation and facade cleanup work.
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151581
EPA, FEMA, and NYC DEP staff correspondence discussing a draft letter regarding indoor air issues and funding support for World Trade Center-related environmental work.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160778
Correspondence between DEP staff discussing exterior cleaning scope, vehicle standards, and coordination with legal counsel in late March 2002.
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000139641
DEP memo forwarding DOH referral regarding potentially anomalous air sample results and questions about building owner compliance with cleaning.
Similarity score 0.986 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000163619
DOH discussion of professional cleaning standards, HEPA vacuuming appropriateness, and residential dust testing.
Similarity score 0.984 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000147703
DOH and DEP staff review air sample analytical results and discuss asbestos fiber detection methodology and building cleaning protocols.
Similarity score 0.984 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.983 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138458
DOH review of air sample analytical methods regarding asbestos fiber differentiation and carpet cleaning/disposal guidance for post-9/11 contamination.
Similarity score 0.978 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138411
Technical memo addressing HEPA vacuuming appropriateness, definitions of professional cleaning, and rug asbestos fiber concentration interpretation.
Similarity score 0.978 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Buildings in this record
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
- 400 Chambers Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.85 · verify page 3
Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder
Filed in the same folder