NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 42/E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002
Document / 6 pages

DEP memo on REBNY meeting scheduling and project details, April

Machine-extracted title · confidence 92%

Correspondence confirming a meeting with REBNY representatives and noting that project details are the primary focus over release forms.

NYC-WTC_000160824–000160829

Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000160826
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Cell: (917)807-2583 e-mail: [email protected]

»> Nancy Jeffery 04/02/02 10:57AM »> So, what do you suggest a response would be to the caller regarding the "letter" should be?

I suggest that we discuss this with FEMA.

Nancy Loder Jeffery Director Environmental and Occupational Disease Epidemiology (212)788-4290

»> Vincent Colt 0 04/02/02 09:46AM »> Jim

Routine HEPA vacuuming is certainly appropriate here.

There is no standard definition of professional cleaning, and it begs the question as to what the cleaning company did. For example, did they remove rugs and matting, HEPA vac and steam clean them and clean the floor before replacing them? This might be a best case cleaning scenario. On the other hand, did they just pass a (non-HEPA) vacuum over the rugs? These types of questions may become more prevalent as tenants begin to reflect on actions taken in their apartments by cleaning services during the immediate aftermath of 9/11.

Two side points - She is requesting bulk dust testing, however if she is HEPA vacuuming every day there shouldn't be enough dust available in her apartment for a bulk sample. Also, the asbestos fiber value for the rug is presented as 42 fibers/cc, which is an airborne concentration and not a loading value.

Vin

»> Jim Miller 04/01/02 08:09PM »> Vin-Does HEPA vacuuming seem appropriate for these conditions? Is there a standard definition re what constitutes "professional cleaning"?

Mike-Does her concern for dusty common areas warrant a referral to DEP for a site visit?

»> WTC Hotline <[email protected]> 04/01/02 12:12PM »> I spoke at length this morning with a woman named PH She lives at 400 Chambers St, apt.i Pili She has 2 young children and is concerned about their health. §he re-occupied her apt in October but didn't test her apt until February. In Feb, she hired Pure Solutions to test the dust/air for $1500, they found asbestos fibers in her rug (42 fibers/cc) she obtained a HEPA Vac and has been cleaning every day. She also had her apt

NYC-WTC_000160826

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000160826Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →