NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/GRM 010290082 - BOX 26/PUBLIC AFFAIRS INQUIRY
Document / 30 pages

Memo on water main additions and retaining wall project, May

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Correspondence regarding water main replacements at a site with a street cave-in and retaining wall scope sketches.

NYC-WTC_000159253–000159282

Folder label: “PUBLIC AFFAIRS INQUIRY”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000159265
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

03/10/2024 00:40 212-669-4980 PAGE 08/25

V . GRIGG & DAVIS ENG iEERS,PVC. 2l Crossway .Scarsdale, NY 10583 Telirax (914)725-5095

March 12,2010

Community Board 8 Land Use Committee Charles Moerdller, Chairman 5676 Riverdale Avenue. Suite 100 Bronx. NY 10471-2194

Re: Pre-Construction Surveys for existing Buildings and Retaining Wall, Periodic Monitoring of Retaining Wall Stability during construction. and Post-Construction Surveys for existing Buildings along Cannon Place — Bronx. NY

Dear Mr. Moerdler:

The Fort Independence Park Neighborhood Association has retained Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C. to provide them with Professional Engineer's recommendations for the prolection of their private property and the dry-laid rubble stone retaining wall along the west side of Cannon Place during the proposed construction of a new Building between Cannon Place and Fort Indcpendencc Street.

On March 5.2010 1 visited the Site and observed the following:

1. The retaining wall is on the west side of Cannon Place and is constructed of rubble stone without mortar ( dry-laid). The height of the retaining wall varies and has a maximum height of approximately 20'-0". The top of the retaining wall is approximately 7'-0" away from the west curb of Cannon Place. See Photograph 1. The facc of the retaining wall has several areas where the rubble stone has %hided outward and is bowing. An appmxirnatcly 20'-0" long section of the retaining wall has been replaced with a poured concrete retaining wall. See Photographs 2 and 3. The eonStruction,joints at each end of the poured concrete section of retaining wall indicate that the retaining wall has continued to move since the poured concrete section was installed, Photograph 4 is the southern construction joint and Photograph 5 is the northern construction joint.

2. The concrete sidewalk at the south end of the retaining wall is in very poor condition due to settlement. See Photograph 6. This settlement is being caused by the loss of the fine soil particles through the retaining wall due to ground water movement. In Photograph 2 the light brown color on the face of the retaining wall is the fine soil particles being washed out.

NYC-WTC 000159265

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000159265Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →