NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 11/WTC Inquiries/Correspondence/Complaints/Referrals
Document / 8 pages

DEP letter re EPA WTC cleanup program extension, Jan 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Letter responding to correspondence regarding the EPA World Trade Center Cleanup Program, noting that extensions through December 28, 2002, were sufficient for registration.

NYC-WTC_000151742–000151749

Folder label: “WTC Inquiries/Correspondence/Complaints/Referrals

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000151748
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

NEW YORK STATE SENATE •17

Senator Marlin Connor

OFFICE OFTHE MACS "' -L^DER --i’ New York Serr'icrk 1:1:1 = FAX December 23,2002

Honorable Christine Todd Whitman EPA Administrator 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., #1101A Washington, DC 20460

Dear Governor Whitman,

As the State Senator for Ground Zero and the surrounding area, I am writing to urge you to extend the deadline for the EPA cleanup, now slated to end on December 28, 2002.

As it now stands, only 1/6 of the residences located in the designated cleanup area have requested that their homes be cleaned. Worse, only 239 buildings are signed up for full building cleanups. This is simply unacceptable. It is clear that much of the reason that more residents have not asked for the cleanup, is due to a lack of adequate outreach and education about potential contamination throughout the area. This task was the responsibility of your agency and they have clearly failed their mandate. The fact that almost 16 months have passed and this situation has not been addressed is outrageous and must not be allowed to continue.

Given the unprecedented devastation and contamination of the area by the terrorist attacks, your agency must take steps to address this failing immediately, First the cleanup deadline must be extended by at least three months. Then your agency must do a better job of reaching this population and of honestly informing it of the possible dangers to their health if both their residences and their entire buildings are not properly cleaned.

Further, there is no invisible barrier that stopped the WTC dust and contaminants at Canal Street, many other communities have been impacted but have been ignored in this cleanup. That, too, is unacceptable. Both Chinatown and the Lower East Side were heavily impacted and must be made part of the cleanup program. Both areas need much more attention, not just to their very real health needs, but also to the ongoing inadequate

O

NYC-WTC_000151748

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000151748Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

DEP response to WTC pollution inquiry, Dec 2002 · Box DEP Box 11

NYC-WTC_000151815

Department of Environmental Protection letter declining jurisdiction over a World Trade Center pollution complaint and referring the inquirer to the Department of Health.

5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.965

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
DEP response to WTC cleanup bidder inquiry, Jun 2002 · Box DEP Box 11

NYC-WTC_000151852

Department of Environmental Protection letter acknowledging an inquiry about World Trade Center remediation and stating that bidder qualification criteria are being developed.

2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.961

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →