NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 11/WTC DC TO RC LETTERS CALLEHAN WHITMAN ETC. WARD DOCTOROFF KENNY
Document / 10 pages

EPA response regarding WTC residential cleaning and testing program

Machine-extracted title · confidence 92%

EPA Region 2 response to inquiry about the joint EPA-DEP World Trade Center residential dust cleanup and testing program funded by FEMA, noting approximately 5,300 requests…

NYC-WTC_000151567–000151576

Folder label: “WTC DC TO RC LETTERS CALLEHAN WHITMAN ETC. WARD DOCTOROFF KENNY

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000151571
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

U.S. Department of .Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administrat tZ 201 Varick Street / ’ NewYork, New York 10014 li' Tel: (212) 337-2378 / Fax:(212)337.2371 ' / OSHA Website Address: http://www.oshat9e*---------------------------

June 14,2002

Kathleen C. Callahan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Deputy Regional Administrator 290 Broadway New York, NY

Dear Ms. Callahan:

This is in response to your latest electronic request addressed to David J. Ippolito, in which you sought a written description of OSHA’s asbestos monitoring data for the assessment and selection of personal protective equipment for use by contractors who will be included in your residential clean-up program.

29 CFR 1926.1101 presumes worker exposure to asbestos in the construction workplace for specific work operations until this presumption is rebutted by air monitoring or until the employer has obtained a Negative Exposure Assessment as defined in this standard. As you know, OSHA activities at the WTC site have included assisting the New York City Department of Design and Construction and the New York City Fire Department (co-incident commanders) in characterizing exposures to many contaminants, including asbestos.

Results from that sampling activity indicate that worker exposures to airborne asbestos have been, and continue to be, very low relative to the applicable limits. As of June 10, OSHA has taken 1,398 airborne asbestos samples (both personal and area) on and around the WTC site. Those samples were analyzed by Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) for total fiber counts, which counts all fibers as defined in the OSHA standard, not just asbestos fibers. Of the 1,398 samples taken, only 157 revealed exposure in excess of OSHA’s applicable Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.1 fiber per cubic centimeter. However, when discriminating counting techniques and-^or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed on these samples, the asbestos fiber count was always less than half of OSHA’s PEL.

In addition, OSHA’s Manhattan Area Oflice has initiated an enforcement local emphasis program (LEP) to monitor cleanup activities in damaged buildings surrounding the WTC site, which we believe represent the heaviest of the settled dust accumulations. The boundaries of this LEP are: Chambers to the North, Broadway to the East, Rector to the South and Hudson River to the West. The air and bulk samples collected during those monitoring inspections contain no detectable levels of asbestos. In summary, as of June 11,2002, twenty-five bulk samples of settled dust and debris taken from six of these surrounding buildings as part of this LEP/building debris removal all were found to be non-detected for asbestos. Twenty-fi\’e air samples, the majority being personal samples, taken in these same buildings to assess exposure on workers

NYC-WTC_000151571

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000151571Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →