NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
The demolition of all WTC complex buildings to ground level was completed by
late December 2001. WTC 4 and WTC 5 were brought down using a vertical
impact system similar to a i^Ie^vCT^ wrecking balls. Section 27-1039d of the
New York City Building Codg'Thls^ethod of bringing down a building req uired
approval of the Borough Commissioner of the Department of Buildingsto use this
method of demolition. The appropriate borough commissoner was consulted and
he concurred in use of this method.had been outlawed in New York for over two
decades, but an exception was granted under the special cireumstances that
existed after the terrorist attack; WTC 6 was brought down using mechamcal
grapplers. A^oto of a grappler is attached at Appendix .witl^^ucial luuroto^
Both NYCDDC and QSHA officials told-us that tThe WTC site was under
continuous dust suppression.(If this is not acceptable then we suggest as an
alternative “EPA officials were at the site and observed that the site was under
continuous dust suppression.” OSHA officials told us that this dust suppression
was very successful, and that two minuit^after demolition you could see across
the space where the buildings had been.I. ^hey further stated that it would have
been too dangerous to send abatement contractors into WTC 4, WTC 5, or WTC 6
to remove asbestos-containing material before demolition^
Treatment of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Both NYCDDC and EPA officials told us that when asbestos-containing material
(e.g., pipe wrapping, steel insulation) was encountered during the removal, it was
tested and treated in accordance with asbestos abatement procedures. According
to the NYCDDC official, the majority of the asbestos-containing material was
encountered when removing the remnants of the basement levels of WTC 6.
below the slurry wall.
EPA Situation Reports confirmed the NYCDDC official’s statement about
asbestos abatements at the site. The reports recorded instances where asbestos
was found during debris removal and asbestos abatements performed. For
example, the EPA May 23,2002, situation report noted that:
Twelve (12) bulk asbestos samples were taken in the Bl, B2, B3,
levels of (WTC) Building 6. The samples were taken from sprayed on
insulation at the request ofNYC DOL Of the twelve samples, nine (9)
should (sic) results were in excess of 1% Chrysotile asbestos, the
results rangedJrom 1.30% to 30.80%. The three samples that were
not above 1% were detectfor Chrysotile asbestos. These samples
were taken from wind braces and girders that were suspected to
contain asbestos. The samples were split samples with Bovis’s
NYC-WTC_000146093
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.