NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Forensic Engineering
STUDY ABSOLVES TWIN TOWER
TRUSSES, FIREPROOFING
ed by the planes’ impacts and
flying debris confirm that
columns with intact fireproof
ing did not succumb to the jet
fuel-triggered fire. The report
also says, of the fireproofing
‘ knocked off the steel, that “no
fireproofing is designed to
withstand such devastating
.) impacts.”
; Levy echoes preliminary
/ reports. “The buildings were
• well-designed, rugged and
withstood a tremendous
; impact,” he says. “The fact that
they did not collapse on the
i planes' impacts saved tens of
thousands of lives."
Questions brought into the
limelight by Sept, 11 include FIRST DOWN Plane took out comer of
whether there is a better way to core, which hastened collapse.
fight fires in tall buildings, says
tf»e engineer. “It's always been a and 2/Axis Corp.
problem,” says Levy. Silverstein’s insurers claim the col-
t>» ' »«yi Aiother issue is whether less- lapse of the south tower, Two WTC, ren-
SMOKE PROOF Engineers say smoke patterns are frangible fireproofing should dered the north tower, One WTC, unsal-
evldence that columns failed first, not floors. be considered for steel struc- vageable even before it collapsed. If they
Cures considered vulnerable to prevail, Silverstein would receive only
THE MOST COMPREHENSn’E STUDY YET blasts and attacks. Experts might also >3.5 billion (ENR 10/7 p. 11).
on the destruction of the World Trade reconsider location of fire stairs and the The insurers commissioned their own
Center concludes that columns robbed strengthening of the core, says Levy. But engineering study, written by Exponent
of fireproofing failed first—not floor he cautions, “You can never anticipate Failure Analysis Associates Inc., Los
trusses-—when the twin 110-story towers exacdy what the threat is going to be.” Angeles. Also released, die report dis
collapsed after being hit by ter ■MM Regarding building materials, agrees with the Weidlinger findings, but
rorist plane attacks on Sept. 11, 1 1 ‘■'7 says: “Concrete is not fool- mostly on points relating to the insur
2001. The proof is in the smoke proof either.” ance batde. Engineers from Wiss, Jan
11
that emanated from the burning The Weidlinger-led study was ney, Elstner and Associates Inc., North-
towers before the collapses. 3 commissioned by Silverstein
“There is no doubt left about W Properties Inc., the New York 2 •J
the sequence of failure,” says City-based leaseholder of the
Matthys P. Levy, chairman of Wei- FAd World Trade nMFWTT i
dlinger Associates Inc., the New levy
York City-based engineer that led ■ — COUAPSfSEOUENCE
the study. a $7-bjllion insur-
s “Failure of the floors...was shown not ance claim. The
to have had any significant role in the research team also (
initiation of the collapses,” says the included LZA Tech-
report Levy describes the floor truss sys nology/Thornton-
tem as “not unsubstantial,” acting more Tomasetti Group; I
like a membrane than a one-way system. ARUPFire; Hughes
I 'There was nothing wrong with it” he Associates Inc.; Safir-
g says. If the floor trusses had collapsed Rosetti; Hillman
I first there would have been a mass of Environmen tai
I smoke as opposed to differentiated Group; RWDI; W. 'fflwfiniii mi r ti ■ Bit Hg.iiiH.flasf
in 5 smoke, floor by floor, he adds. Gene Corley, who led
The report also exonerates the steel’s the ASCE-FEMA
I sprayed-on fireproofing. Computer WTC study; Profes-
I models that identify the columns affect- sor Sean Ahearn; SECOND DOWN North tower lasted longer due to Impact site.
ENR/November 4. 200’2
NYC-WTC_000142978
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.