NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
unms were made of steel, and the
Defending intense heat would have caused the
girders to expand, distorting their
sha^pe and s^ipang their strength,
leading to the collapse.
Skyscrapers .-“It’s better to build in reinforced
^concrete,” said Dr. Mir M, Ali, a
professor of architecture at the Uni
f Against Terror versity of Illinois. “If there is an
impact, crash or explosion, it can
absorb the energy better. That
makes the building less vulnerable.”
But reinforced concrete — con
By KENNETH CHANG crete with steel bars inside — is
heavier. When construction began on
No one designs a skyscraper to withstand the direct hit the World Trade Center in the late
of a fully fueled 767, and construction engineers agree that 196O’s, concrete was not a viable
such an attack would have doomed almost any high-rise. option because it would have re
Each World Trade Center tower absorbed the impact of quired huge, unwieldy pillars to sup
a jet with a shudder, as each was designed to do, and stood. port the towers’ weight But high-
Inside, though, 2,000-degree infernos started burning, fed strength concrete developed in re
by thousands of gallons of jet fuel cent years has made it more practi
It then became a question of time. Would the fuel bum up cal.
first or would the steel columns weaken and buckle under the “The trend is toward more con
heat? crete,” Dr. Mir said. “The technol
For the people on floors above the crash site, there was ogy has substantially Improved. An
another critical factor: an ordinary fire would take two or all-concrete structure would have
three hours to bum through the gypsum wallboard around lasted longer.”
the stairwells — but projectiles of plane wreckage almost Each of the two Petronas Towers
certainly pierced through, letting in the fire and smoke. That has an outer ring of 16 7-foot-wlde
trapped people on the upper floors. columns made of concrete and at the
The south tower collapsed 56 minutes after impact The center of each tower is a 75-foot by
north tower lasted an hour and 40 minutes. 75-foot concrete core — almost a
Someone probably could build a fortress skyscraper. building within a building — that
“Given enough money, we can design anything,” said Dr. houses the stairwells and elevator
Charles H. Thornton, chairman of the Thomton-Tomasetti shafts.
Group Inc. of New York City, the structural engineering firm Concrete — a mix of cement, sand
that worked on the 1,483-foot-taII Petronas Towers in Kuala and gravel — is not impervious to
Lumpur, Malaysia. heat, rae cement expands at a differ
But no one would pay to build one, and no one would want ent rate than the sand and gravel,
to work there. Such a building would probably have the causing cracks. Under intense heat,
aesthetic appeal of a containment vessel of a nuclear power some types of concrete can flake
plant, which is designed to survive the crash of a falling 747. apart at about three-quarters of an
In the decades since the World Trade Center was built, inch an hour, eventually exposing the
however, new materials and building techniques — some steel inside.
used on the more recent super skyscrapers like the.Petronas “It ultimately would lose its
Towers — may have given people more time to escape. strength,” Dr. Thornton said.
The key would have been slowing the fir'es. The sprinkler The concrete core of the Petronas
systems offered little help. Towers may have remained intact
Even if the pipes survived the impact, the sprinklers of a under a similar crash and provided a
typical skyscraper put out a few hundred gallons of water a better escape route than the gypsum
minute for half an hour. Dr. Thornton said, and water would walled stairwells of the World Trade
have been useless against a fuel fire in any case. (Water and Center.
oil don’t mix; droplets of water sink “In our buildings, most of the
into the fuel, turn into hot steam and stairways are in the core, which is a
explode, and the fuel continues burn very safe haven,” Dr. Thornton said.
ing.) The cores of the Petronas Towers
By contrast, an anti-fire system at are also pressurized to keep smoke
an aircraft hangar can unleash a and fire out of the stairwells.
deluge of 120,000 gallons a minute of In addition to building more fire-
water and foam — which sticks to resistant structures, another protec
burning fuel for two hours tion against crashing airplanes
straight, Dr. Thornton said. would be to keep the jet fuel from
Since extinguishing the fire is im entering the interior, of the building.
possible, “You have to build a more At the University of California at
rugged building,” said Dr. R. Brady Berkeley, Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-
Williamson, an emeritus professor of Asl, a professor of structural engi
civil engineering at the University of neering, has been developing a new
California at Berkeley. construction technique — bolting
The main ingredients of any sky half-inch steel plates to six-inch con
scraper are steel and concrete. Both crete wadis — to create buildings that
are strong, but in different ways.
Concrete bears more weight; steel
can bend without breaking. The
World Trade Center’s supporting col-
NVTimes A • li-oi Page lofA
NYC-\/VTC_000152351
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.